PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVHNY
Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR
0.00%76.45%0.00%
IBCZ.DE
iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-1.92%26.50%-1.50%
Different Trading Currencies

AVHNY is traded in USD, while IBCZ.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IBCZ.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


AVHNY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
64.99%
1Y
64.99%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBCZ.DE

1D
2.43%
1M
-3.18%
YTD
-1.92%
6M
2.11%
1Y
23.17%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
9.26%
10Y*
10.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVHNY
AVHNY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AVHNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVHNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVHNY Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
AVHNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVHNY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCZ.DE
IBCZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) and iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVHNYIBCZ.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

24.86

2.00

+22.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

25.66

1.29

+24.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

24.63

2.54

+22.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

40.99

11.07

+29.92

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVHNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the IBCZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVHNY and IBCZ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVHNYIBCZ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.61

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between AVHNY and IBCZ.DE is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

AVHNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while IBCZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVHNY drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum IBCZ.DE drawdown of -34.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVHNY and IBCZ.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AVHNYIBCZ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-33.99%

+31.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-12.48%

+9.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.56%

+2.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.90%

-4.59%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

1.71%

-0.12%

Volatility

AVHNY vs. IBCZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ackermans & Van Haaren NV ADR (AVHNY) is 0.00%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Multifactor UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCZ.DE) has a volatility of 4.98%. This indicates that AVHNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AVHNYIBCZ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.98%

-4.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.07%

9.06%

+41.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.49%

16.36%

+49.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.58%

15.45%

+48.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.58%

15.87%

+47.71%