PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. ANAB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LQDA vs. ANAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 143.87% return, which is significantly higher than ANAB's 65.10% return.


LQDA

1D
-3.10%
1M
6.04%
6M
98.42%
YTD
143.87%
1Y
350.03%
3Y*
120.93%
5Y*
105.41%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.92%

ANAB

1D
-3.05%
1M
-18.45%
6M
68.83%
YTD
65.10%
1Y
226.03%
3Y*
57.31%
5Y*
28.35%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$39.97M$46.98M$40.05M
$129.21M$115.99M$136.40M

LQDA vs. ANAB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
143.87%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%73.98%
ANAB
AnaptysBio, Inc.
65.10%266.16%-38.19%-30.88%-10.82%61.63%32.31%-74.53%-21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and ANAB is 0.12, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDA:

$7.48B

ANAB:

$2.30B

EPS

LQDA:

$0.23

ANAB:

-$0.90

PS Ratio

LQDA:

27.98

ANAB:

6.82

PB Ratio

LQDA:

78.33

ANAB:

120.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDA:

$288.07M

ANAB:

$232.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDA:

$275.77M

ANAB:

$245.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDA:

$51.53M

ANAB:

$52.72M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDA vs. ANAB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ANAB
ANAB Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ANAB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANAB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANAB Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANAB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANAB Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LQDA vs. ANAB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LQDAANABDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.45

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

9.89

8.14

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.71

19.84

+5.88

LQDA vs. ANAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 5.31, which is higher than the ANAB Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and ANAB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. ANAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, roughly equal to the maximum ANAB drawdown of -92.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and ANAB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDAANABDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.87%

-92.08%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.66%

-27.96%

-7.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-69.32%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-69.32%

+13.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.53%

-37.74%

+32.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-68.43%

-64.17%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.69%

11.45%

+2.24%

Volatility

LQDA vs. ANAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) is 19.04%, while AnaptysBio, Inc. (ANAB) has a volatility of 27.46%. This indicates that LQDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDAANABDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.04%

27.46%

-8.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.97%

51.26%

-2.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.53%

73.55%

-7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.06%

66.36%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.46%

75.51%

+9.95%

Dividends

LQDA vs. ANAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither LQDA nor ANAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LQDA vs. ANAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and AnaptysBio, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LQDA and ANAB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ANAB has higher volatility (27.46%) compared to LQDA (19.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs ANAB's -92.08%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.31 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDA and ANAB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer