PortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. AIA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and AIA is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

LQDA vs. AIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
25.86%
28.09%
LQDA
AIA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDA:

0.20

AIA:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

LQDA:

0.66

AIA:

1.03

Omega Ratio

LQDA:

1.10

AIA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

LQDA:

0.15

AIA:

0.46

Martin Ratio

LQDA:

0.58

AIA:

2.28

Ulcer Index

LQDA:

19.84%

AIA:

7.26%

Daily Std Dev

LQDA:

57.49%

AIA:

27.16%

Max Drawdown

LQDA:

-93.87%

AIA:

-60.89%

Current Drawdown

LQDA:

-62.43%

AIA:

-24.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 18.79% return, which is significantly higher than AIA's 3.27% return.


LQDA

YTD

18.79%

1M

-5.29%

6M

26.88%

1Y

8.72%

5Y*

22.28%

10Y*

N/A

AIA

YTD

3.27%

1M

-3.18%

6M

-0.68%

1Y

17.28%

5Y*

6.24%

10Y*

4.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDA vs. AIA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDA is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDA is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

AIA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AIA is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AIA is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AIA is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AIA is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AIA is 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AIA is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDA vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LQDA: 0.20
AIA: 0.61
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LQDA: 0.66
AIA: 1.03
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LQDA: 1.10
AIA: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.15, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LQDA: 0.15
AIA: 0.46
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-10.00-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
LQDA: 0.58
AIA: 2.28

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the AIA Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and AIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.20
0.61
LQDA
AIA

Dividends

LQDA vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AIA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
2.70%2.78%2.62%2.59%1.53%1.11%2.24%2.50%1.45%2.29%2.88%2.24%

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than AIA's maximum drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and AIA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-62.43%
-24.77%
LQDA
AIA

Volatility

LQDA vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 18.08% compared to iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) at 14.47%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
18.08%
14.47%
LQDA
AIA