PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. LQDI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQDA vs. LQDI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 61.47% return, which is significantly higher than LQDI's 1.72% return.


LQDA

1D
1.05%
1M
44.72%
YTD
61.47%
6M
65.06%
1Y
236.90%
3Y*
84.34%
5Y*
80.96%
10Y*

LQDI

1D
-0.39%
1M
0.66%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.56%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDA vs. LQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
61.47%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%95.14%
LQDI
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
1.72%8.84%1.48%8.85%-15.33%7.53%11.82%15.83%-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and LQDI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDA vs. LQDI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

LQDI
LQDI Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LQDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDI Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDA vs. LQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDALQDIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.26

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.69

2.54

+4.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.83

7.71

+7.12

LQDA vs. LQDI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 3.55, which is higher than the LQDI Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and LQDI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDALQDIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.55

1.47

+2.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.24

+0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.40

-0.14

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. LQDI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than LQDI's maximum drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and LQDI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDALQDIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.87%

-28.99%

-64.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.66%

-2.88%

-32.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-6.27%

-40.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-20.67%

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

-0.39%

-9.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.76%

-5.25%

-64.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

0.95%

+15.10%

Volatility

LQDA vs. LQDI - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 26.78% compared to iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) at 1.20%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDALQDIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.78%

1.20%

+25.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.56%

3.44%

+44.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.16%

4.97%

+62.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.46%

8.18%

+65.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.70%

10.84%

+74.86%

Dividends

LQDA vs. LQDI - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQDI
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
4.58%4.46%4.65%3.98%3.27%2.42%2.34%3.26%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


LQDA and LQDI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQDA has higher volatility (26.78%) compared to LQDI (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs LQDI's -28.99%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDA and LQDI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer