PortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. LQD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and LQD is 0.26, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.3

Performance

LQDA vs. LQD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
25.95%
16.99%
LQDA
LQD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LQDA:

0.21

LQD:

0.80

Sortino Ratio

LQDA:

0.68

LQD:

1.16

Omega Ratio

LQDA:

1.10

LQD:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

LQDA:

0.16

LQD:

0.39

Martin Ratio

LQDA:

0.61

LQD:

2.26

Ulcer Index

LQDA:

19.87%

LQD:

2.69%

Daily Std Dev

LQDA:

57.41%

LQD:

7.56%

Max Drawdown

LQDA:

-93.87%

LQD:

-24.95%

Current Drawdown

LQDA:

-62.40%

LQD:

-9.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 18.88% return, which is significantly higher than LQD's 1.45% return.


LQDA

YTD

18.88%

1M

-3.65%

6M

28.85%

1Y

6.15%

5Y*

22.28%

10Y*

N/A

LQD

YTD

1.45%

1M

-1.37%

6M

0.50%

1Y

6.22%

5Y*

-0.25%

10Y*

2.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LQDA vs. LQD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQDA is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQDA is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQDA is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQDA is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQDA is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LQD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LQD is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LQD is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LQD is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LQD is 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LQD is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LQD is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LQDA vs. LQD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
LQDA: 0.21
LQD: 0.80
The chart of Sortino ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
LQDA: 0.68
LQD: 1.16
The chart of Omega ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 1.10, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
LQDA: 1.10
LQD: 1.14
The chart of Calmar ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.16, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
LQDA: 0.16
LQD: 0.39
The chart of Martin ratio for LQDA, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.00
LQDA: 0.61
LQD: 2.26

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the LQD Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and LQD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.21
0.80
LQDA
LQD

Dividends

LQDA vs. LQD - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.07%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%3.39%

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. LQD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than LQD's maximum drawdown of -24.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and LQD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-62.40%
-9.88%
LQDA
LQD

Volatility

LQDA vs. LQD - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 18.02% compared to iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) at 4.06%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
18.02%
4.06%
LQDA
LQD