PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQD vs. XLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQD vs. XLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than XLU's 5.04% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has underperformed XLU with an annualized return of 2.54%, while XLU has yielded a comparatively higher 9.20% annualized return.


LQD

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.80%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.24%
1Y
5.80%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
2.54%

XLU

1D
1.09%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.48%
1Y
12.50%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
9.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQD vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
0.82%7.90%0.86%9.40%-17.92%-1.84%10.97%17.37%-3.79%7.06%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
5.04%16.03%23.31%-7.18%1.44%17.70%0.51%25.93%3.94%12.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LQD and XLU is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002

0.16

The correlation between LQD and XLU shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.32 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQD vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQD
LQD Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
LQD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQD Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
LQD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQD Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XLU
XLU Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQD vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LQDXLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.30

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

2.80

+1.57

LQD vs. XLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQD Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the XLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQD and XLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LQD vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and XLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDXLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.95%

-51.98%

+27.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.34%

-9.18%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.43%

-17.26%

+8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.95%

-25.26%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.95%

-36.07%

+11.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.37%

-6.05%

+2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-10.22%

+6.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

4.25%

-3.06%

Volatility

LQD vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 1.78%, while State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a volatility of 5.59%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDXLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

5.59%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

11.68%

-7.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.37%

14.66%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

17.34%

-8.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

19.27%

-10.58%

LQD vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LQD vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison

LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than XLU's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQD
iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
4.55%4.48%4.45%3.99%3.30%2.30%2.66%3.29%3.67%3.10%3.34%3.47%
XLU
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.67%2.71%2.96%3.39%2.92%2.79%3.14%2.95%3.33%3.33%3.41%3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


LQD and XLU have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to LQD (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQD dropped -24.95% vs XLU's -51.98%.

On 10-year performance, XLU leads with 9.20% vs 2.54% for LQD. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, LQD has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.20% return vs 2.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for LQD.

LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.55%, compared with 2.67% for XLU.

LQD is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while XLU is Utilities Equities. LQD tracks iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQD and 0.08% for XLU.

LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQD and XLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer