LQD vs. MDLZ
LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid Investment Grade Index, while MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, LQD returned 2.54%/yr vs 6.09%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LQD vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQD achieves a 0.82% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LQD has underperformed MDLZ with an annualized return of 2.54%, while MDLZ has yielded a comparatively higher 6.09% annualized return.
LQD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- 0.82%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.30%
- 5Y*
- -0.21%
- 10Y*
- 2.54%
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
LQD vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.82% | 7.90% | 0.86% | 9.40% | -17.92% | -1.84% | 10.97% | 17.37% | -3.79% | 7.06% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQD and MDLZ is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2002 | 0.06 |
The correlation between LQD and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQD vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
LQD
MDLZ
LQD vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQD | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | -0.17 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | -0.30 | +4.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQD vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQD | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | -42.52% | +17.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | -25.93% | +22.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | -29.00% | +20.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | -29.14% | +4.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.95% | -29.74% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.37% | -12.59% | +9.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -11.03% | +7.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 14.70% | -13.51% |
Volatility
LQD vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) is 1.78%, while Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that LQD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQD | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 5.46% | -3.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.02% | 16.28% | -12.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.37% | 22.26% | -16.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 19.52% | -10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.69% | 21.03% | -12.34% |
Dividends
LQD vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.55% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQD and MDLZ have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to LQD (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQD dropped -24.95% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
LQD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQD and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer