MDLZ vs. GIS
MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) and GIS (General Mills, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MDLZ in Confectioners, GIS in Packaged Foods. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ returned 6.26%/yr vs -3.03%/yr for GIS. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
MDLZ vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 17.73% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -19.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 6.26%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower -3.03% annualized return.
MDLZ
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 0.85%
- 3Y*
- -2.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- 6.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.17%
GIS
- 1D
- -1.84%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- 6M
- -20.05%
- YTD
- -19.35%
- 1Y
- -22.41%
- 3Y*
- -17.97%
- 5Y*
- -5.89%
- 10Y*
- -3.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.79M | $365.30M | $369.16M | |
| $659.78M | $585.31M | $549.68M |
MDLZ vs. GIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 17.73% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 2.92% | 15.87% | 8.58% | 40.42% | -4.27% | -1.58% |
GIS General Mills, Inc. | -19.35% | -23.75% | 1.45% | -19.97% | 28.09% | 18.53% | 13.60% | 43.13% | -31.57% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDLZ and GIS is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2001 | 0.51 |
The correlation between MDLZ and GIS shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.63 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MDLZ:
$79.53B
GIS:
$19.08B
MDLZ:
$3.62
GIS:
-$0.16
MDLZ:
1.53
GIS:
1.05
MDLZ:
$39.68B
GIS:
$18.42B
MDLZ:
$12.36B
GIS:
$6.19B
MDLZ:
$5.73B
GIS:
$300.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDLZ vs. GIS — Risk / Return Rank
MDLZ
GIS
MDLZ vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDLZ | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.87 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | -0.66 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | -1.24 | +1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDLZ vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum GIS drawdown of -59.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and GIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDLZ | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.52% | -59.63% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.62% | -34.28% | +15.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.00% | -53.45% | +24.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.14% | -59.63% | +30.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.74% | -59.63% | +29.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.81% | -54.37% | +41.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -10.42% | -0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.23% | 18.14% | -9.91% |
Volatility
MDLZ vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) is 9.83%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that MDLZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDLZ | GIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.83% | 10.73% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 22.41% | -4.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.07% | 26.78% | -3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.09% | 22.08% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.10% | 22.51% | -1.41% |
Dividends
MDLZ vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than GIS's 6.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GIS General Mills, Inc. | 6.83% | 5.20% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.21% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Financials
MDLZ vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MDLZ vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison
MDLZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.99B and revenue of 9.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
GIS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 4.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.8%.
MDLZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.95B and revenue of 9.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.8%.
GIS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of -2.09B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in an operating margin of -45.4%.
MDLZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 9.36B, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
GIS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of -2.01B and revenue of 4.61B, resulting in a net margin of -43.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDLZ and GIS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIS has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to MDLZ (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDLZ dropped -42.52% vs GIS's -59.63%.
MDLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.01 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDLZ and GIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer