PortfoliosLab logo
MDLZ vs. GIS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and GIS is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MDLZ vs. GIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
247.88%
430.17%
MDLZ
GIS

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MDLZ:

-0.07

GIS:

-0.91

Sortino Ratio

MDLZ:

0.04

GIS:

-1.18

Omega Ratio

MDLZ:

1.00

GIS:

0.86

Calmar Ratio

MDLZ:

-0.06

GIS:

-0.56

Martin Ratio

MDLZ:

-0.13

GIS:

-1.50

Ulcer Index

MDLZ:

11.96%

GIS:

13.19%

Daily Std Dev

MDLZ:

20.86%

GIS:

21.76%

Max Drawdown

MDLZ:

-46.04%

GIS:

-45.08%

Current Drawdown

MDLZ:

-9.34%

GIS:

-35.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDLZ:

$87.79B

GIS:

$31.07B

EPS

MDLZ:

$2.69

GIS:

$4.55

PE Ratio

MDLZ:

25.20

GIS:

12.47

PEG Ratio

MDLZ:

4.55

GIS:

3.61

PS Ratio

MDLZ:

2.41

GIS:

1.53

PB Ratio

MDLZ:

3.40

GIS:

3.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDLZ:

$36.46B

GIS:

$19.64B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDLZ:

$11.94B

GIS:

$6.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDLZ:

$5.95B

GIS:

$3.99B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDLZ achieves a 13.82% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has outperformed GIS with an annualized return of 7.84%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.18% annualized return.


MDLZ

YTD

13.82%

1M

1.81%

6M

-0.76%

1Y

-0.75%

5Y*

8.70%

10Y*

7.84%

GIS

YTD

-12.65%

1M

-7.52%

6M

-18.46%

1Y

-17.98%

5Y*

1.83%

10Y*

3.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MDLZ vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MDLZ is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MDLZ is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

GIS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GIS is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GIS is 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GIS is 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GIS is 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GIS is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MDLZ vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.07
-0.91
MDLZ
GIS

Dividends

MDLZ vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than GIS's 4.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
2.72%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%1.60%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
4.40%3.73%3.47%2.50%3.03%3.37%3.66%5.03%3.27%3.01%3.00%3.02%

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, roughly equal to the maximum GIS drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-9.34%
-35.19%
MDLZ
GIS

Volatility

MDLZ vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 7.08%. This indicates that MDLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
7.56%
7.08%
MDLZ
GIS

Financials

MDLZ vs. GIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B8.00B9.00B10.00B20212022202320242025
9.31B
4.84B
(MDLZ) Total Revenue
(GIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDLZ vs. GIS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mondelez International, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
26.1%
33.9%
(MDLZ) Gross Margin
(GIS) Gross Margin
MDLZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.43B and revenue of 9.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.1%.

GIS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.64B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.9%.

MDLZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 680.00M and revenue of 9.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

GIS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported an operating income of 891.40M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.4%.

MDLZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 402.00M and revenue of 9.31B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

GIS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, General Mills, Inc. reported a net income of 625.60M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.