PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDLZ vs. PEP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MDLZ vs. PEP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MDLZ having a 10.55% return and PEP slightly lower at 10.41%. Over the past 10 years, MDLZ has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 5.79%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 7.32% annualized return.


MDLZ

1D
-0.15%
1M
9.50%
YTD
10.55%
6M
-2.26%
1Y
-9.08%
3Y*
-3.01%
5Y*
2.67%
10Y*
5.79%

PEP

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
10.41%
6M
6.62%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
-1.69%
5Y*
5.17%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDLZ vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
10.55%-7.03%-15.30%11.17%2.92%15.87%8.58%40.42%-4.27%-1.58%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
10.41%-1.85%-7.60%-3.29%6.78%20.56%11.67%27.38%-4.81%17.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MDLZ and PEP is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2001

0.51

The correlation between MDLZ and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.66 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MDLZ:

$76.23B

PEP:

$215.33B

EPS

MDLZ:

$1.89

PEP:

$6.00

PE Ratio

MDLZ:

31.25

PEP:

26.16

PS Ratio

MDLZ:

1.99

PEP:

2.29

PB Ratio

MDLZ:

2.95

PEP:

10.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

MDLZ:

$38.54B

PEP:

$93.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MDLZ:

$10.94B

PEP:

$50.86B

EBITDA (TTM)

MDLZ:

$4.50B

PEP:

$14.39B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDLZ vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDLZ
MDLZ Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MDLZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDLZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDLZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
MDLZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDLZ Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

PEP
PEP Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDLZ vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDLZPEPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.35

0.61

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.34

1.09

-1.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.12

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.19

1.32

-1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.35

2.60

-2.95

MDLZ vs. PEP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDLZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is lower than the PEP Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDLZ and PEP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDLZPEPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

0.61

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.29

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.38

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.39

-0.06

Drawdowns

MDLZ vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDLZ drawdown since its inception was -42.52%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDLZ and PEP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MDLZPEPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.52%

-73.92%

+31.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.93%

-12.47%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.14%

-30.32%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.74%

-30.32%

+0.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.13%

-11.39%

-6.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.00%

-13.64%

+2.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.76%

6.31%

+7.45%

Volatility

MDLZ vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison

Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) at 5.84%. This indicates that MDLZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MDLZPEPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

5.84%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.24%

14.90%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.97%

21.94%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.26%

18.15%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.02%

19.56%

+1.46%

Dividends

MDLZ vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison

MDLZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than PEP's 3.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDLZ
Mondelez International, Inc.
3.34%3.60%3.00%2.24%2.21%2.01%2.05%1.98%2.40%1.92%1.62%1.43%
PEP
PepsiCo, Inc.
3.62%3.92%3.51%2.91%2.50%2.45%2.71%2.77%3.25%2.64%2.83%2.76%

Financials

MDLZ vs. PEP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mondelez International, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
10.50B
29.34B
(MDLZ) Total Revenue
(PEP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MDLZ vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mondelez International, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
28.2%
53.2%
Portfolio components
MDLZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.96B and revenue of 10.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.2%.

PEP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.62B and revenue of 29.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

MDLZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported an operating income of 952.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

PEP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.56B and revenue of 29.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

MDLZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mondelez International, Inc. reported a net income of 665.00M and revenue of 10.50B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

PEP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 2.54B and revenue of 29.34B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.