LOAN vs. CIM
LOAN (Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.) and CIM (Chimera Investment Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the REIT - Mortgage industry within the Real Estate sector. Over the past 10 years, LOAN returned 7.47%/yr vs -1.39%/yr for CIM. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LOAN vs. CIM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -3.60% return, which is significantly lower than CIM's 10.78% return. Over the past 10 years, LOAN has outperformed CIM with an annualized return of 7.47%, while CIM has yielded a comparatively lower -1.39% annualized return.
LOAN
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- -3.60%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- -8.33%
- 3Y*
- 2.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 7.47%
CIM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 10.78%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 9.45%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- -11.82%
- 10Y*
- -1.39%
LOAN vs. CIM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | -3.60% | -9.37% | 22.47% | 2.12% | 5.67% | 13.92% | -10.36% | 21.90% | 1.46% | -16.15% |
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 10.78% | -0.65% | 3.61% | 2.95% | -57.95% | 60.73% | -42.97% | 27.65% | 7.71% | 17.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOAN and CIM is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2007 | 0.10 |
The correlation between LOAN and CIM shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LOAN:
$50.07M
CIM:
$1.11B
LOAN:
$0.44
CIM:
$0.23
LOAN:
9.99
CIM:
56.88
LOAN:
5.17
CIM:
0.12
LOAN:
5.91
CIM:
2.20
LOAN:
1.16
CIM:
0.45
LOAN:
$8.47M
CIM:
$499.18M
LOAN:
$6.80M
CIM:
$465.68M
LOAN:
$5.02M
CIM:
$439.34M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOAN vs. CIM — Risk / Return Rank
LOAN
CIM
LOAN vs. CIM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOAN | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | 0.52 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 1.27 | -1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOAN vs. CIM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, roughly equal to the maximum CIM drawdown of -89.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and CIM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOAN | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -89.69% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -18.18% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.22% | -35.80% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -69.09% | +36.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | -72.35% | +13.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.77% | -59.51% | +41.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -51.75% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.15% | 7.48% | +6.67% |
Volatility
LOAN vs. CIM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) is 4.21%, while Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that LOAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOAN | CIM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 5.94% | -1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.94% | 17.77% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.68% | 25.07% | -3.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.12% | 35.22% | -9.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.41% | 36.49% | -2.08% |
Dividends
LOAN vs. CIM - Dividend Comparison
LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.39%, less than CIM's 11.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 11.75% | 11.91% | 10.14% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 8.12% | 14.34% | 28.15% |
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | 10.39% | 9.89% | 8.21% | 9.05% | 9.38% | 8.82% | 8.06% | 7.55% | 8.54% | 6.97% | 4.93% | 9.68% |
Financials
LOAN vs. CIM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Chimera Investment Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LOAN and CIM have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIM has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to LOAN (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs CIM's -89.69%.
CIM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOAN and CIM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer