PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOAN vs. ABR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOAN vs. ABR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -6.06% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -25.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LOAN having a 7.80% annualized return and ABR not far ahead at 8.15%.


LOAN

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-6.06%
6M
-3.71%
1Y
-8.57%
3Y*
4.96%
5Y*
-0.63%
10Y*
7.80%

ABR

1D
-1.28%
1M
-29.63%
YTD
-25.46%
6M
-35.15%
1Y
-35.06%
3Y*
-16.46%
5Y*
-12.36%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOAN vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
-6.06%-9.37%22.47%2.12%5.67%13.92%-10.36%21.90%1.46%-16.15%
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
-25.46%-36.65%3.16%29.73%-20.73%39.42%10.04%55.19%30.04%26.60%

Correlation

The correlation between LOAN and ABR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2004

0.10

The correlation between LOAN and ABR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LOAN:

$48.79M

ABR:

$1.15B

EPS

LOAN:

$0.44

ABR:

$0.57

PE Ratio

LOAN:

9.74

ABR:

9.45

PS Ratio

LOAN:

5.76

ABR:

1.22

PB Ratio

LOAN:

1.13

ABR:

0.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOAN:

$8.47M

ABR:

$940.70M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOAN:

$6.80M

ABR:

$829.57M

EBITDA (TTM)

LOAN:

$5.02M

ABR:

$878.83M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOAN vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOAN
LOAN Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LOAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAN Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

ABR
ABR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ABR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
ABR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABR Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOAN vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOANABRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

-0.86

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.43

-1.08

+0.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.86

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.69

+0.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.76

-1.35

+0.59

LOAN vs. ABR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is higher than the ABR Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOAN and ABR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOANABRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

-0.86

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.33

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.20

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.05

+0.01

Drawdowns

LOAN vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and ABR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOANABRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-97.76%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-51.99%

+29.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-57.01%

+34.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-57.01%

+24.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

-72.76%

+13.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.87%

-57.01%

+37.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.91%

-41.85%

-4.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.54%

26.56%

-13.02%

Volatility

LOAN vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) is 4.43%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 21.40%. This indicates that LOAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOANABRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

21.40%

-16.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.20%

33.40%

-19.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.79%

40.95%

-19.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.09%

37.08%

-10.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.43%

40.39%

-5.96%

Dividends

LOAN vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison

LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.66%, less than ABR's 19.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ABR
Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.
19.74%17.14%12.42%11.07%11.68%7.53%8.67%7.94%11.22%8.33%8.31%8.11%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
10.66%9.89%8.21%9.05%9.38%8.82%8.06%7.55%8.54%6.97%4.93%9.68%

Financials

LOAN vs. ABR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
2.07M
25.74M
(LOAN) Total Revenue
(ABR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOAN vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
82.4%
-85.3%
Portfolio components
LOAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70M and revenue of 2.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.4%.

ABR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.

LOAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

ABR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

LOAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in a net margin of 61.6%.

ABR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOAN and ABR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ABR has higher volatility (21.40%) compared to LOAN (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs ABR's -97.76%.

LOAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.40 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOAN and ABR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer