PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOAN vs. GLPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LOAN vs. GLPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than GLPI's 2.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LOAN has underperformed GLPI with an annualized return of 6.87%, while GLPI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.


LOAN

1D
0.91%
1M
5.74%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-6.13%
1Y
-7.67%
3Y*
4.75%
5Y*
-1.27%
10Y*
6.87%

GLPI

1D
-0.90%
1M
-5.90%
YTD
2.25%
6M
1.64%
1Y
1.35%
3Y*
4.35%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOAN vs. GLPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
-2.72%-9.37%22.47%2.12%5.67%13.92%-10.36%21.90%1.46%-16.15%
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
2.25%-0.80%3.95%0.92%13.49%22.10%4.18%42.88%-5.89%29.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LOAN and GLPI is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2013

0.09

Fundamentals

EPS

LOAN:

$0.44

GLPI:

$4.24

PE Ratio

LOAN:

10.08

GLPI:

10.42

PEG Ratio

LOAN:

5.22

GLPI:

1.49

PS Ratio

LOAN:

5.97

GLPI:

5.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

LOAN:

$8.47M

GLPI:

$1.56B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LOAN:

$6.80M

GLPI:

$608.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

LOAN:

$5.02M

GLPI:

$1.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOAN vs. GLPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOAN
LOAN Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LOAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GLPI
GLPI Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GLPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GLPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLPI Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOAN vs. GLPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LOANGLPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.03

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

0.11

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

0.27

-0.81

LOAN vs. GLPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOAN Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the GLPI Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOAN and GLPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LOAN vs. GLPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than GLPI's maximum drawdown of -69.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and GLPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOANGLPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.93%

-69.44%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.10%

-12.39%

-9.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.22%

-14.90%

-7.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.59%

-17.12%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.16%

-69.44%

+10.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.02%

-8.28%

-8.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.41%

-8.28%

-38.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.19%

5.09%

+9.10%

Volatility

LOAN vs. GLPI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) is 4.15%, while Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that LOAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOANGLPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.15%

6.07%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

12.63%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.72%

18.07%

+3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.05%

19.86%

+6.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

28.85%

+5.54%

Dividends

LOAN vs. GLPI - Dividend Comparison

LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.29%, more than GLPI's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.
7.15%6.94%6.31%6.38%5.38%5.96%5.33%6.36%7.95%6.76%7.58%7.84%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
10.29%9.89%8.21%9.05%9.38%8.82%8.06%7.55%8.54%6.97%4.93%9.68%

Financials

LOAN vs. GLPI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
2.07M
356.52M
(LOAN) Total Revenue
(GLPI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LOAN vs. GLPI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. and Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
82.4%
0
Portfolio components
LOAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70M and revenue of 2.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.4%.

GLPI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 356.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LOAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

GLPI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 333.35M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 93.5%.

LOAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in a net margin of 61.6%.

GLPI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 231.83M and revenue of 356.52M, resulting in a net margin of 65.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LOAN and GLPI have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLPI has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to LOAN (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs GLPI's -69.44%.

GLPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.07 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOAN and GLPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer