LOAN vs. BLV
LOAN (Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.) is a stock, while BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) is Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, LOAN returned 6.87%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for BLV. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
LOAN vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LOAN has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 6.87%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.91% annualized return.
LOAN
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -6.13%
- 1Y
- -7.67%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- -1.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.87%
BLV
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 1.85%
- 5Y*
- -3.65%
- 10Y*
- 0.91%
LOAN vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | -2.72% | -9.37% | 22.47% | 2.12% | 5.67% | 13.92% | -10.36% | 21.90% | 1.46% | -16.15% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 0.81% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOAN and BLV is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between LOAN and BLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOAN vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
LOAN
BLV
LOAN vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.12 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.96 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 2.34 | -2.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOAN vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and BLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -38.29% | -52.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -5.73% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.22% | -15.16% | -7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.59% | -36.27% | +3.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | -38.29% | -20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.02% | -23.74% | +6.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.41% | -9.55% | -36.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.19% | 2.34% | +11.85% |
Volatility
LOAN vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) has a higher volatility of 4.15% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 1.97%. This indicates that LOAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 1.97% | +2.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 5.76% | +8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.72% | 7.98% | +13.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 12.93% | +13.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.39% | 11.99% | +22.40% |
Dividends
LOAN vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.29%, more than BLV's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.78% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | 10.29% | 9.89% | 8.21% | 9.05% | 9.38% | 8.82% | 8.06% | 7.55% | 8.54% | 6.97% | 4.93% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOAN and BLV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOAN has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to BLV (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs BLV's -38.29%.
BLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOAN and BLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer