LOAN vs. BLV
LOAN (Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.) is a stock, while BLV (Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF) is Long-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Long Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. Over the past 10 years, LOAN returned 5.10%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for BLV. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past.
Performance
LOAN vs. BLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LOAN achieves a -6.24% return, which is significantly lower than BLV's -2.81% return. Over the past 10 years, LOAN has outperformed BLV with an annualized return of 5.10%, while BLV has yielded a comparatively lower 0.27% annualized return.
LOAN
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- YTD
- -6.24%
- 1Y
- -16.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- 0.80%
- 10Y*
- 5.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.08%
BLV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -2.98%
- YTD
- -2.81%
- 1Y
- -0.73%
- 3Y*
- 1.49%
- 5Y*
- -5.04%
- 10Y*
- 0.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.82M | $52.31M | $45.06M | |
| $196.97K | $225.91K | $150.46K |
LOAN vs. BLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | -6.24% | -9.37% | 22.47% | 2.12% | 5.67% | 13.92% | -10.36% | 21.90% | 1.46% | -16.15% |
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | -2.81% | 6.44% | -3.65% | 7.35% | -26.95% | -2.89% | 16.13% | 18.99% | -4.17% | 10.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between LOAN and BLV is 0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2007 | -0.01 |
The correlation between LOAN and BLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.11 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LOAN vs. BLV — Risk / Return Rank
LOAN
BLV
LOAN vs. BLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) and Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.02 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.07 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | 0.16 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LOAN vs. BLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LOAN drawdown since its inception was -90.93%, which is greater than BLV's maximum drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOAN and BLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.93% | -38.29% | -52.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.51% | -5.92% | -18.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.83% | -11.70% | -13.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.72% | -36.27% | +10.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.16% | -38.29% | -20.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.02% | -26.48% | +6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.29% | -9.63% | -36.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.08% | 2.63% | +12.45% |
Volatility
LOAN vs. BLV - Volatility Comparison
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) has a higher volatility of 13.63% compared to Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF (BLV) at 2.12%. This indicates that LOAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LOAN | BLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.63% | 2.12% | +11.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.25% | 5.96% | +12.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.43% | 7.83% | +15.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.32% | 12.90% | +12.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.47% | 11.95% | +22.52% |
Dividends
LOAN vs. BLV - Dividend Comparison
LOAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than BLV's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLV Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF | 4.54% | 4.67% | 5.09% | 4.06% | 4.17% | 3.37% | 6.12% | 3.57% | 4.07% | 3.63% | 4.16% | 4.37% |
LOAN Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. | 10.82% | 9.89% | 8.21% | 9.05% | 9.38% | 8.82% | 8.06% | 7.55% | 8.54% | 6.97% | 4.93% | 9.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LOAN and BLV have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOAN has higher volatility (13.63%) compared to BLV (2.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOAN dropped -90.93% vs BLV's -38.29%.
BLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.05 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LOAN and BLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer