CIM vs. TWO
Compare and contrast key facts about Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO).
Performance
CIM vs. TWO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CIM vs. TWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 4.77% | -0.65% | 3.61% | 2.95% | -57.95% | 60.73% | -42.97% | 27.65% | 7.71% | 17.30% |
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 11.29% | 2.52% | -2.73% | 2.31% | -23.25% | 0.03% | -52.19% | 28.73% | -10.33% | 26.53% |
Fundamentals
CIM:
$4.21
TWO:
-$4.36
CIM:
2.36
TWO:
2.79
CIM:
$290.86M
TWO:
$422.76M
CIM:
$290.86M
TWO:
$561.79M
CIM:
$331.37M
TWO:
$420.52M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 4.77% return, which is significantly lower than TWO's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has outperformed TWO with an annualized return of -0.52%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively lower -2.99% annualized return.
CIM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 4.77%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 11.07%
- 3Y*
- 1.29%
- 5Y*
- -10.14%
- 10Y*
- -0.52%
TWO
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 11.29%
- 6M
- 19.15%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.44%
- 5Y*
- -5.97%
- 10Y*
- -2.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CIM vs. TWO — Risk / Return Rank
CIM
TWO
CIM vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CIM | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.36 | -0.05 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 0.25 | +0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.03 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.57 | -0.08 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | -0.16 | +1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CIM | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 | -0.05 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | -0.18 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | -0.06 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.06 | 0.06 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CIM and TWO is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CIM vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison
CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, less than TWO's 13.44% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIM Chimera Investment Corporation | 12.42% | 11.91% | 10.14% | 14.03% | 20.36% | 8.55% | 13.66% | 9.73% | 11.22% | 8.12% | 14.34% | 28.15% |
TWO Two Harbors Investment Corp. | 13.44% | 15.52% | 15.22% | 15.08% | 12.94% | 11.79% | 7.85% | 11.42% | 14.64% | 23.31% | 10.67% | 12.84% |
Drawdowns
CIM vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than TWO's maximum drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and TWO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CIM | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.69% | -84.71% | -4.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.18% | -36.81% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -69.09% | -57.23% | -11.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.35% | -84.71% | +12.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.71% | -61.51% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.67% | -28.24% | -23.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.07% | 17.68% | -9.61% |
Volatility
CIM vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is 7.24%, while Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that CIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CIM | TWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.24% | 16.89% | -9.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.82% | 36.84% | -16.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.28% | 43.19% | -11.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.26% | 33.58% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 47.91% | -11.52% |
Financials
CIM vs. TWO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Two Harbors Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities