PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CIM vs. TWO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CIMTWO
YTD Return6.78%-4.54%
1Y Return8.83%-1.79%
3Y Return (Ann)-24.58%-10.78%
5Y Return (Ann)-15.18%-17.87%
10Y Return (Ann)-0.01%-5.54%
Sharpe Ratio0.440.09
Sortino Ratio0.860.27
Omega Ratio1.111.04
Calmar Ratio0.220.03
Martin Ratio1.390.34
Ulcer Index11.67%6.20%
Daily Std Dev36.60%22.77%
Max Drawdown-89.69%-84.71%
Current Drawdown-62.09%-66.89%

Fundamentals


CIMTWO
Market Cap$1.19B$1.23B
EPS$3.33-$4.69
PEG Ratio-28.143.59
Total Revenue (TTM)$631.62M-$420.60M
Gross Profit (TTM)$582.22M-$541.48M
EBITDA (TTM)$607.64M-$305.35M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between CIM and TWO is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CIM vs. TWO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 6.78% return, which is significantly higher than TWO's -4.54% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has outperformed TWO with an annualized return of -0.01%, while TWO has yielded a comparatively lower -5.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
14.45%
-4.13%
CIM
TWO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CIM vs. TWO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CIM
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.44, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.44
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.86, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.86
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CIM, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.22
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CIM, currently valued at 1.39, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.39
TWO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TWO, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TWO, currently valued at 0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TWO, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TWO, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TWO, currently valued at 0.34, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.34

CIM vs. TWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the TWO Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and TWO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.44
0.09
CIM
TWO

Dividends

CIM vs. TWO - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, less than TWO's 15.50% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
9.31%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%10.82%14.34%14.08%17.61%11.61%
TWO
Two Harbors Investment Corp.
15.50%15.08%12.94%11.79%7.85%11.42%14.64%10.65%10.67%12.84%10.38%12.61%

Drawdowns

CIM vs. TWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than TWO's maximum drawdown of -84.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and TWO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-65.00%-60.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-62.09%
-66.89%
CIM
TWO

Volatility

CIM vs. TWO - Volatility Comparison

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Two Harbors Investment Corp. (TWO) have volatilities of 8.81% and 8.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.81%
8.59%
CIM
TWO

Financials

CIM vs. TWO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Two Harbors Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items