PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIM vs. JBLU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CIM vs. JBLU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than JBLU's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has outperformed JBLU with an annualized return of -1.60%, while JBLU has yielded a comparatively lower -9.84% annualized return.


CIM

1D
-1.20%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
9.44%
6M
7.84%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
-12.50%
10Y*
-1.60%

JBLU

1D
-3.35%
1M
8.71%
YTD
20.66%
6M
10.69%
1Y
36.91%
3Y*
-11.57%
5Y*
-20.53%
10Y*
-9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIM vs. JBLU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
9.44%-0.65%3.61%2.95%-57.95%60.73%-42.97%27.65%7.71%17.30%
JBLU
JetBlue Airways Corporation
20.66%-42.11%41.62%-14.35%-54.49%-2.06%-22.33%16.56%-28.11%-0.36%

Correlation

The correlation between CIM and JBLU is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2007

0.36

Fundamentals

EPS

CIM:

$0.23

JBLU:

-$2.61

PS Ratio

CIM:

2.17

JBLU:

0.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

CIM:

$499.18M

JBLU:

$9.16B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CIM:

$465.68M

JBLU:

$3.64B

EBITDA (TTM)

CIM:

$439.34M

JBLU:

$151.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIM vs. JBLU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIM
CIM Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIM Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIM Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

JBLU
JBLU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
JBLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBLU Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JBLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBLU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIM vs. JBLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIMJBLUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.15

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.43

0.99

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.04

2.12

-1.08

CIM vs. JBLU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the JBLU Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and JBLU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIM vs. JBLU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, roughly equal to the maximum JBLU drawdown of -90.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and JBLU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIMJBLUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.69%

-90.91%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-37.62%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.80%

-63.29%

+27.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-69.09%

-80.28%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.35%

-85.58%

+13.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.00%

-82.42%

+22.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.75%

-60.46%

+8.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.49%

17.47%

-9.98%

Volatility

CIM vs. JBLU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) is 5.76%, while JetBlue Airways Corporation (JBLU) has a volatility of 20.67%. This indicates that CIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIMJBLUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

20.67%

-14.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.72%

50.72%

-33.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.15%

61.91%

-36.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.20%

60.48%

-25.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.51%

54.63%

-18.12%

Dividends

CIM vs. JBLU - Dividend Comparison

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, while JBLU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIM
Chimera Investment Corporation
11.89%11.91%10.14%14.03%20.36%8.55%13.66%9.73%11.22%8.12%14.34%28.15%
JBLU
JetBlue Airways Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CIM vs. JBLU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and JetBlue Airways Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B202220232024202520260
2.24B
(CIM) Total Revenue
(JBLU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CIM and JBLU have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBLU has higher volatility (20.67%) compared to CIM (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIM dropped -89.69% vs JBLU's -90.91%.

JBLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIM and JBLU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer