CIM vs. NLY

In the year-to-date period, CIM achieves a -3.12% return, which is significantly lower than NLY's 7.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CIM has underperformed NLY with an annualized return of 0.13%, while NLY has yielded a comparatively higher 4.64% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is higher than the NLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIM and NLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.08%, less than NLY's 13.98% yield.

The maximum CIM drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than NLY's maximum drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIM and NLY.

Chimera Investment Corporation (CIM) has a higher volatility of 10.94% compared to Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) at 5.87%. This indicates that CIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chimera Investment Corporation and Annaly Capital Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.