LNG vs. PH
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 22.78%/yr vs 25.12%/yr for PH. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than PH's 3.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 22.78%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.12% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
PH
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.39%
- YTD
- 3.21%
- 6M
- 2.52%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 36.33%
- 5Y*
- 26.12%
- 10Y*
- 25.12%
LNG vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 3.21% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and PH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.25 |
The correlation between LNG and PH shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNG:
$50.79B
PH:
$115.65B
LNG:
$6.80
PH:
$27.11
LNG:
35.48
PH:
33.33
LNG:
0.19
PH:
1.41
LNG:
2.58
PH:
5.53
LNG:
13.53
PH:
7.43
LNG:
$20.28B
PH:
$20.99B
LNG:
$5.52B
PH:
$7.81B
LNG:
$5.81B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
PH
LNG vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 1.90 | -1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 5.64 | -5.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than PH's maximum drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -66.92% | -30.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -19.34% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -26.79% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -28.64% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -54.68% | -2.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -11.49% | -7.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -15.33% | -27.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 6.52% | +5.36% |
Volatility
LNG vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.19%, while Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) has a volatility of 7.58%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 7.58% | -0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 18.96% | +2.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 25.10% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 28.68% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 31.70% | +0.80% |
Dividends
LNG vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than PH's 0.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.82% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
LNG vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and PH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PH has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer