PH vs. ETN
Compare and contrast key facts about Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN).
Performance
PH vs. ETN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PH vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 4.95% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 15.13% | -2.79% | 39.51% | 56.22% | -7.18% | 46.70% | 29.88% | 42.76% | -10.04% | 21.54% |
Fundamentals
PH:
$117.95B
ETN:
$142.39B
PH:
$27.53
ETN:
$10.47
PH:
33.45
ETN:
34.93
PH:
1.41
ETN:
1.90
PH:
5.78
ETN:
5.20
PH:
7.69
ETN:
7.31
PH:
$20.46B
ETN:
$27.45B
PH:
$7.63B
ETN:
$10.32B
PH:
$5.26B
ETN:
$5.90B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 4.95% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed ETN with an annualized return of 25.41%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively lower 21.98% annualized return.
PH
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -8.96%
- YTD
- 4.95%
- 6M
- 22.41%
- 1Y
- 52.38%
- 3Y*
- 41.54%
- 5Y*
- 25.46%
- 10Y*
- 25.41%
ETN
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- 15.13%
- 6M
- -1.64%
- 1Y
- 33.74%
- 3Y*
- 30.52%
- 5Y*
- 23.26%
- 10Y*
- 21.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PH vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank
PH
ETN
PH vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PH | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 0.99 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 1.51 | +0.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 1.89 | +1.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 4.21 | +7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PH | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 0.99 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.80 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.74 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between PH and ETN is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PH vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison
PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than ETN's 1.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.78% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
ETN Eaton Corporation plc | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.13% | 1.43% | 2.06% | 1.76% | 1.88% | 3.00% | 3.85% | 3.04% | 3.40% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
PH vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and ETN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PH | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.92% | -68.95% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.77% | -19.14% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.64% | -34.46% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.68% | -44.55% | -10.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | -7.42% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.35% | -14.93% | -0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.66% | 8.58% | -3.92% |
Volatility
PH vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison
Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) have volatilities of 10.21% and 10.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PH | ETN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.21% | 10.43% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.08% | 23.39% | -5.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.94% | 34.38% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 29.21% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.53% | 29.65% | +1.88% |
Financials
PH vs. ETN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PH vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.93B and revenue of 5.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.3%.
ETN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.60B and revenue of 7.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.09B and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
ETN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 845.00M and revenue of 5.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.3%.
ETN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 7.06B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.