PortfoliosLab logo
PH vs. ETN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PH and ETN is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PH vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PH:

0.64

ETN:

-0.08

Sortino Ratio

PH:

1.14

ETN:

0.22

Omega Ratio

PH:

1.17

ETN:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

PH:

0.85

ETN:

-0.03

Martin Ratio

PH:

2.82

ETN:

-0.08

Ulcer Index

PH:

8.04%

ETN:

14.24%

Daily Std Dev

PH:

34.94%

ETN:

38.45%

Max Drawdown

PH:

-66.92%

ETN:

-68.95%

Current Drawdown

PH:

-6.06%

ETN:

-14.01%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PH:

$86.90B

ETN:

$128.44B

EPS

PH:

$25.98

ETN:

$9.91

PE Ratio

PH:

26.18

ETN:

33.12

PEG Ratio

PH:

3.04

ETN:

2.76

PS Ratio

PH:

4.39

ETN:

5.07

PB Ratio

PH:

6.49

ETN:

6.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

PH:

$19.79B

ETN:

$25.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PH:

$4.24B

ETN:

$9.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

PH:

$4.67B

ETN:

$5.80B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PH achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than ETN's -2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, PH has outperformed ETN with an annualized return of 20.16%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively lower 19.14% annualized return.


PH

YTD

4.59%

1M

21.26%

6M

-3.65%

1Y

22.27%

3Y*

38.63%

5Y*

33.59%

10Y*

20.16%

ETN

YTD

-2.18%

1M

24.66%

6M

-9.94%

1Y

-2.99%

3Y*

36.10%

5Y*

35.07%

10Y*

19.14%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Parker-Hannifin Corporation

Eaton Corporation plc

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PH vs. ETN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PH is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PH is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PH is 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PH is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PH is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PH is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ETN is 4646
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ETN is 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ETN is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ETN is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ETN is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ETN is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PH vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PH Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PH and ETN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PH vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

PH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ETN's 1.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
1.01%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%1.61%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.23%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%2.43%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%2.88%

Drawdowns

PH vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PH drawdown since its inception was -66.92%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PH and ETN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PH vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) is 6.45%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 7.29%. This indicates that PH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PH vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B3.50B4.00B4.50B5.00B5.50B6.00B6.50B20212022202320242025
4.96B
6.38B
(PH) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PH vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
-23.4%
38.4%
(PH) Gross Margin
(ETN) Gross Margin
PH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of -1.16B and revenue of 4.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -23.4%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 6.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.4%.

PH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of -1.91B and revenue of 4.96B, resulting in an operating margin of -38.5%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 1.20B and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.8%.

PH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 960.87M and revenue of 4.96B, resulting in a net margin of 19.4%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 964.00M and revenue of 6.38B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.