LNG vs. NTR
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, LNG returned 26.62%/yr vs 6.79%/yr for NTR. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LNG vs. NTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 36.26% return, which is significantly higher than NTR's 13.74% return.
LNG
- 1D
- 2.14%
- 1M
- 8.06%
- 6M
- 25.23%
- YTD
- 36.26%
- 1Y
- 12.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 26.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.85%
NTR
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 13.74%
- 1Y
- 20.50%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.79%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.03%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $449.81M | $470.16M | $533.59M | |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | $147.85M | $152.00M | $188.14M |
LNG vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.26% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 13.74% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and NTR is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.38 |
Fundamentals
LNG:
$55.23B
NTR:
$33.16B
LNG:
$6.86
NTR:
$4.94
LNG:
38.44
NTR:
13.98
LNG:
0.21
NTR:
0.21
LNG:
2.80
NTR:
1.20
LNG:
14.78
NTR:
1.32
LNG:
$20.28B
NTR:
$27.76B
LNG:
$5.52B
NTR:
$8.66B
LNG:
$5.81B
NTR:
$6.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
NTR
LNG vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.54 | 0.75 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 1.91 | -0.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than NTR's maximum drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and NTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -57.80% | -40.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -27.56% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -31.81% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -57.80% | +32.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.02% | -29.23% | +18.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.02% | -26.27% | -16.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.86% | 10.78% | +2.08% |
Volatility
LNG vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 9.48% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 8.20%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.48% | 8.20% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.32% | 24.47% | -1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.45% | 32.29% | -5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.42% | 34.20% | -3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.28% | 33.90% | -1.62% |
Dividends
LNG vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than NTR's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.17% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% |
Financials
LNG vs. NTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. NTR - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and NTR have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (9.48%) compared to NTR (8.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs NTR's -57.80%.
NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and NTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer