NTR vs. SQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: NTR or SQM.
Key characteristics
| NTR | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -13.88% | -38.22% |
| 1Y Return | -9.83% | -21.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -8.93% | -12.08% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 2.61% | 15.02% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.31 | -0.41 |
| Sortino Ratio | -0.27 | -0.32 |
| Omega Ratio | 0.97 | 0.96 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.15 | -0.30 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.64 | -0.68 |
| Ulcer Index | 13.41% | 28.96% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.99% | 48.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -57.51% | -77.80% |
| Current Drawdown | -55.38% | -62.62% |
Fundamentals
| NTR | SQM | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.17B | $10.39B |
| EPS | $1.48 | $0.09 |
| PE Ratio | 32.99 | 424.33 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.15 | 0.66 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $25.67B | $3.69B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $7.35B | $1.15B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $3.19B | $1.23B |
Correlation
The correlation between NTR and SQM is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
NTR vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a -13.88% return, which is significantly higher than SQM's -38.22% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
NTR vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
NTR vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than SQM's 1.93% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 4.58% | 3.76% | 2.63% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.93% | 8.51% | 9.79% | 3.90% | 1.65% | 4.59% | 5.41% | 2.39% | 5.31% | 2.41% | 5.83% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
NTR vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.51%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -77.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and SQM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
NTR vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 7.99%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 12.20%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
NTR vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities