NTR vs. SQM
NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) and SQM (Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — NTR in Agricultural Inputs, SQM in Chemicals. Over the past 5 years, NTR returned 3.81%/yr vs 15.12%/yr for SQM. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NTR vs. SQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NTR achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SQM's 12.46% return.
NTR
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- -1.70%
- 1Y
- 5.61%
- 3Y*
- 5.57%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- —
SQM
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- YTD
- 12.46%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 135.51%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- 15.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.78%
NTR vs. SQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 0.43% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 12.46% | 89.55% | -39.35% | -18.47% | 71.62% | 6.82% | 89.19% | -27.30% | -32.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between NTR and SQM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.44 |
Over the past year, the correlation between NTR and SQM has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
NTR:
$29.64B
SQM:
$21.80B
NTR:
$4.93
SQM:
$2.86
NTR:
12.48
SQM:
26.73
NTR:
0.19
SQM:
0.16
NTR:
1.07
SQM:
4.11
NTR:
1.17
SQM:
3.72
NTR:
$27.76B
SQM:
$5.31B
NTR:
$8.66B
SQM:
$1.83B
NTR:
$6.33B
SQM:
$1.75B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NTR vs. SQM — Risk / Return Rank
NTR
SQM
NTR vs. SQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NTR | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.37 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 5.90 | -5.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.62 | 16.03 | -15.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NTR vs. SQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NTR drawdown since its inception was -57.80%, smaller than the maximum SQM drawdown of -78.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NTR and SQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NTR | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.80% | -78.34% | +20.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -23.11% | -3.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.82% | -61.32% | +28.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.80% | -69.76% | +11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.51% | -21.96% | -15.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.20% | -30.31% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.09% | 8.49% | +0.60% |
Volatility
NTR vs. SQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) is 6.78%, while Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that NTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NTR | SQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 14.60% | -7.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.47% | 36.42% | -10.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.72% | 51.38% | -19.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.15% | 49.84% | -15.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.97% | 46.15% | -12.18% |
Dividends
NTR vs. SQM - Dividend Comparison
NTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than SQM's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.55% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SQM Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. | 1.51% | 0.18% | 0.59% | 8.34% | 9.66% | 3.92% | 1.64% | 4.55% | 5.37% | 2.73% | 4.77% | 2.00% |
Financials
NTR vs. SQM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Nutrien Ltd. and Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
NTR vs. SQM - Profitability Comparison
NTR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.62B and revenue of 5.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
SQM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a gross profit of 778.60M and revenue of 1.76B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.2%.
NTR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported an operating income of 419.11M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.
SQM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported an operating income of 729.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.5%.
NTR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Nutrien Ltd. reported a net income of 129.19M and revenue of 5.96B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
SQM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. reported a net income of 364.70M and revenue of 1.76B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NTR and SQM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQM has higher volatility (14.60%) compared to NTR (6.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NTR dropped -57.80% vs SQM's -78.34%.
SQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NTR and SQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer