LNG vs. MLI
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and MLI (Mueller Industries, Inc.) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while MLI operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 22.78%/yr vs 26.81%/yr for MLI. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. MLI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than MLI's 20.99% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed MLI with an annualized return of 22.78%, while MLI has yielded a comparatively higher 26.81% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
MLI
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- 20.99%
- 6M
- 21.99%
- 1Y
- 87.91%
- 3Y*
- 51.41%
- 5Y*
- 44.58%
- 10Y*
- 26.81%
LNG vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 20.99% | 46.29% | 70.51% | 62.38% | 1.05% | 70.95% | 12.30% | 37.79% | -33.10% | -2.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and MLI is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.24 |
The correlation between LNG and MLI shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.30 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNG:
$6.80
MLI:
$10.18
LNG:
35.48
MLI:
13.57
LNG:
0.19
MLI:
0.88
LNG:
2.58
MLI:
2.63
LNG:
$20.28B
MLI:
$4.37B
LNG:
$5.52B
MLI:
$871.92M
LNG:
$5.81B
MLI:
$1.03B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
MLI
LNG vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.47 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 3.72 | -3.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | 10.31 | -10.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than MLI's maximum drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and MLI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -61.72% | -36.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -22.33% | -1.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -27.79% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -27.79% | +2.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -52.95% | -4.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -1.69% | -16.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -16.04% | -27.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 8.05% | +3.83% |
Volatility
LNG vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.19%, while Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) has a volatility of 10.51%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | MLI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 10.51% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 25.80% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 30.28% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 33.06% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 35.77% | -3.27% |
Dividends
LNG vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than MLI's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLI Mueller Industries, Inc. | 0.87% | 0.87% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.69% | 0.88% | 1.14% | 1.26% | 1.71% | 9.60% | 0.94% | 1.11% |
Financials
LNG vs. MLI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Mueller Industries, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. MLI - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MLI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
MLI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 312.23M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
MLI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mueller Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 239.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 20.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and MLI have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLI has higher volatility (10.51%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs MLI's -61.72%.
MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and MLI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer