LNG vs. HLT
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and HLT (Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while HLT operates in Lodging (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 21.07%/yr vs 45.86%/yr for HLT. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. HLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 36.98% return, which is significantly higher than HLT's 12.70% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has underperformed HLT with an annualized return of 21.07%, while HLT has yielded a comparatively higher 45.86% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 16.70%
- 6M
- 28.82%
- YTD
- 36.98%
- 1Y
- 9.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.93%
- 5Y*
- 26.92%
- 10Y*
- 21.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.88%
HLT
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- 6M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 29.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.28%
- 10Y*
- 45.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.49%
LNG vs. HLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 36.98% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 12.70% | 16.49% | 36.11% | 44.68% | -18.72% | 40.20% | 0.47% | 55.48% | -9.40% | 829.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and HLT is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2013 | 0.29 |
The correlation between LNG and HLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNG:
$55.52B
HLT:
$73.63B
LNG:
$6.86
HLT:
$6.52
LNG:
38.64
HLT:
49.64
LNG:
0.21
HLT:
0.80
LNG:
2.81
HLT:
6.23
LNG:
$20.28B
HLT:
$12.28B
LNG:
$5.52B
HLT:
$5.44B
LNG:
$5.81B
HLT:
$3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. HLT — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
HLT
LNG vs. HLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.15 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.40 | 1.84 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.75 | 4.19 | -3.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. HLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than HLT's maximum drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and HLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -50.82% | -47.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -10.29% | -13.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -26.35% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -32.65% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -50.82% | -6.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.56% | -7.65% | -2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.06% | -9.67% | -33.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.00% | 4.51% | +8.49% |
Volatility
LNG vs. HLT - Volatility Comparison
Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 8.07% compared to Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) at 6.40%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | HLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.07% | 6.40% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.62% | 17.44% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.90% | 23.35% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.33% | 26.95% | +3.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.29% | 181.05% | -148.76% |
Dividends
LNG vs. HLT - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than HLT's 0.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLT Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.54% | 0.84% | 31.40% | 1.03% | 0.65% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LNG vs. HLT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. HLT - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HLT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.94B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
HLT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 678.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
HLT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 385.00M and revenue of 2.94B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and HLT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LNG has higher volatility (8.07%) compared to HLT (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs HLT's -50.82%.
HLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and HLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer