HLT vs. MAR

In the year-to-date period, HLT achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly higher than MAR's -15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, HLT has outperformed MAR with an annualized return of 14.43%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively lower 12.38% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current HLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is higher than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLT and MAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

HLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than MAR's 1.07% yield.

The maximum HLT drawdown since its inception was -50.82%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLT and MAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. (HLT) is 14.03%, while Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) has a volatility of 16.38%. This indicates that HLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.