PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LNG vs. E
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LNG vs. E - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Eni S.p.A. (E). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than E's 44.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed E with an annualized return of 22.78%, while E has yielded a comparatively lower 12.46% annualized return.


LNG

1D
0.47%
1M
0.79%
YTD
24.74%
6M
28.05%
1Y
3.66%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
23.34%
10Y*
22.78%

E

1D
-1.04%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
44.27%
6M
45.57%
1Y
75.29%
3Y*
32.48%
5Y*
23.85%
10Y*
12.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LNG vs. E - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
24.74%-8.70%27.18%15.02%49.30%69.48%-1.70%3.18%9.94%29.95%
E
Eni S.p.A.
44.27%48.40%-13.95%26.73%10.92%43.12%-28.73%4.29%-0.98%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between LNG and E is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997

0.28

The correlation between LNG and E shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.43 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LNG:

$50.79B

E:

$80.49B

EPS

LNG:

$6.80

E:

€1.65

PE Ratio

LNG:

35.48

E:

28.11

PEG Ratio

LNG:

0.19

E:

2.64

PS Ratio

LNG:

2.58

E:

0.89

PB Ratio

LNG:

13.53

E:

1.41

Total Revenue (TTM)

LNG:

$20.28B

E:

€79.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LNG:

$5.52B

E:

€2.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LNG:

$5.81B

E:

€15.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LNG vs. E — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LNG
LNG Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
LNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNG Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
LNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

E
E Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
E Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
E Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
E Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
E Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
E Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LNG vs. E - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Eni S.p.A. (E). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LNGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.53

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.15

8.14

-7.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.31

26.54

-26.23

LNG vs. E - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the E Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LNG and E, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LNG vs. E - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than E's maximum drawdown of -70.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and E.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LNGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.84%

-70.53%

-27.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.09%

-9.30%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.87%

-20.13%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.87%

-33.71%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.53%

-61.59%

+4.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.55%

-6.08%

-12.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.14%

-23.07%

-20.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

2.85%

+9.03%

Volatility

LNG vs. E - Volatility Comparison

Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to Eni S.p.A. (E) at 6.01%. This indicates that LNG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than E based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LNGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.19%

6.01%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.49%

19.56%

+1.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

22.72%

+4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.27%

25.04%

+5.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.50%

28.30%

+4.20%

Dividends

LNG vs. E - Dividend Comparison

LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than E's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
E
Eni S.p.A.
4.50%5.88%7.69%5.74%6.38%5.79%5.91%6.11%5.15%3.96%3.98%5.14%
LNG
Cheniere Energy, Inc.
0.90%1.06%0.84%0.95%0.92%0.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LNG vs. E - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Eni S.p.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
5.87B
20.07B
(LNG) Total Revenue
(E) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LNG values in USD, E values in EUR

LNG vs. E - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Eni S.p.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
6.0%
Portfolio components
LNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

E - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported a gross profit of 1.20B and revenue of 20.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.0%.

LNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.

E - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported an operating income of 1.47B and revenue of 20.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

LNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.

E - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 20.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LNG and E have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LNG has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to E (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs E's -70.53%.

E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LNG and E

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer