E vs. KMI
E (Eni S.p.A.) and KMI (Kinder Morgan, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — E in Oil & Gas Integrated, KMI in Oil & Gas Midstream. Over the past 10 years, E returned 12.97%/yr vs 10.37%/yr for KMI. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
E vs. KMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, E achieves a 49.82% return, which is significantly higher than KMI's 19.29% return. Over the past 10 years, E has outperformed KMI with an annualized return of 12.97%, while KMI has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.
E
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 38.91%
- YTD
- 49.82%
- 1Y
- 72.88%
- 3Y*
- 30.16%
- 5Y*
- 26.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.39%
KMI
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 19.29%
- 1Y
- 18.01%
- 3Y*
- 28.06%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.86%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $24.39M | $21.06M | $21.85M | |
| $379.13M | $306.76M | $325.97M |
E vs. KMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 49.82% | 48.40% | -13.95% | 26.73% | 10.92% | 43.12% | -28.73% | 4.29% | -0.98% | 7.27% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 19.29% | 4.74% | 64.42% | 4.10% | 21.23% | 23.75% | -30.77% | 44.43% | -11.18% | -10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between E and KMI is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2011 | 0.48 |
The correlation between E and KMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.51 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
E:
$80.49B
KMI:
$71.66B
E:
€3.51
KMI:
$0.95
E:
13.74
KMI:
33.79
E:
1.18
KMI:
2.06
E:
0.88
KMI:
4.53
E:
€83.24B
KMI:
$11.85B
E:
€5.52B
KMI:
$5.16B
E:
€15.32B
KMI:
$5.61B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
E vs. KMI — Risk / Return Rank
E
KMI
E vs. KMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eni S.p.A. (E) and Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| E | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.17 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 1.81 | +1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 3.83 | +8.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
E vs. KMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum E drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, roughly equal to the maximum KMI drawdown of -72.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for E and KMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| E | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -72.70% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.00% | -10.08% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.13% | -18.40% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.71% | -20.31% | -13.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.59% | -55.13% | -6.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.47% | -6.21% | +3.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -31.84% | +8.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.79% | 4.76% | +1.03% |
Volatility
E vs. KMI - Volatility Comparison
Eni S.p.A. (E) has a higher volatility of 10.66% compared to Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) at 5.69%. This indicates that E's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| E | KMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | 5.69% | +4.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.89% | 14.36% | +7.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 20.15% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.37% | 22.41% | +2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.17% | 27.45% | +0.72% |
Dividends
E vs. KMI - Dividend Comparison
E's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than KMI's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
E Eni S.p.A. | 4.34% | 5.88% | 7.69% | 5.74% | 6.38% | 5.79% | 5.91% | 6.11% | 5.15% | 3.96% | 3.98% | 5.14% |
KMI Kinder Morgan, Inc. | 2.74% | 4.24% | 4.18% | 6.38% | 6.10% | 6.76% | 7.59% | 4.49% | 4.71% | 2.77% | 2.41% | 12.94% |
Financials
E vs. KMI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eni S.p.A. and Kinder Morgan, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
E vs. KMI - Profitability Comparison
E - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported a gross profit of 2.08B and revenue of 22.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
KMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a gross profit of -1.63B and revenue of -1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
E - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported an operating income of 2.39B and revenue of 22.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
KMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.44B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 88.7%.
E - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Eni S.p.A. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 22.68B, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
KMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kinder Morgan, Inc. reported a net income of -1.01B and revenue of -1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 62.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
E and KMI have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
E has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to KMI (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, E dropped -70.53% vs KMI's -72.70%.
E currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for E and KMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer