LNG vs. BBWI
LNG (Cheniere Energy, Inc.) and BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.) are both stocks. LNG operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while BBWI operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, LNG returned 22.78%/yr vs -6.65%/yr for BBWI. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LNG vs. BBWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LNG achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than BBWI's -1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, LNG has outperformed BBWI with an annualized return of 22.78%, while BBWI has yielded a comparatively lower -6.65% annualized return.
LNG
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 24.74%
- 6M
- 28.05%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 23.34%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
BBWI
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- -1.33%
- 1Y
- -22.74%
- 3Y*
- -19.94%
- 5Y*
- -16.60%
- 10Y*
- -6.65%
LNG vs. BBWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 24.74% | -8.70% | 27.18% | 15.02% | 49.30% | 69.48% | -1.70% | 3.18% | 9.94% | 29.95% |
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | -1.48% | -46.52% | -8.26% | 4.68% | -38.40% | 133.77% | 107.78% | -25.18% | -54.31% | -3.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LNG and BBWI is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 1997 | 0.16 |
The correlation between LNG and BBWI shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.20 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LNG:
$6.80
BBWI:
$4.58
LNG:
35.48
BBWI:
4.24
LNG:
2.58
BBWI:
0.42
LNG:
$20.28B
BBWI:
$7.25B
LNG:
$5.52B
BBWI:
$3.13B
LNG:
$5.81B
BBWI:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LNG vs. BBWI — Risk / Return Rank
LNG
BBWI
LNG vs. BBWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) and Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LNG | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.97 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | -0.41 | +0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.31 | -0.71 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LNG vs. BBWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LNG drawdown since its inception was -97.84%, which is greater than BBWI's maximum drawdown of -88.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LNG and BBWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LNG | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.84% | -88.22% | -9.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.09% | -55.00% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.87% | -69.98% | +45.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.87% | -79.16% | +54.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.53% | -85.67% | +28.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.55% | -72.24% | +53.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.14% | -30.35% | -12.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.88% | 31.98% | -20.10% |
Volatility
LNG vs. BBWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cheniere Energy, Inc. (LNG) is 7.19%, while Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) has a volatility of 18.68%. This indicates that LNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LNG | BBWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 18.68% | -11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.49% | 39.03% | -17.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.02% | 56.34% | -29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.27% | 50.65% | -20.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.50% | 54.62% | -22.12% |
Dividends
LNG vs. BBWI - Dividend Comparison
LNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than BBWI's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBWI Bath & Body Works, Inc. | 4.12% | 3.98% | 2.06% | 1.85% | 1.90% | 22.61% | 0.81% | 6.62% | 9.35% | 3.99% | 6.68% | 4.17% |
LNG Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 0.90% | 1.06% | 0.84% | 0.95% | 0.92% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LNG vs. BBWI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cheniere Energy, Inc. and Bath & Body Works, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LNG vs. BBWI - Profitability Comparison
LNG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BBWI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a gross profit of 587.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.
LNG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of -3.49B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in an operating margin of -59.4%.
BBWI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported an operating income of 231.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.
LNG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cheniere Energy, Inc. reported a net income of -3.50B and revenue of 5.87B, resulting in a net margin of -59.7%.
BBWI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bath & Body Works, Inc. reported a net income of 183.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LNG and BBWI have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBWI has higher volatility (18.68%) compared to LNG (7.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LNG dropped -97.84% vs BBWI's -88.22%.
LNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LNG and BBWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer