PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BBWI vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BBWI and SMH is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

BBWI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.65%
-9.93%
BBWI
SMH

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BBWI:

-0.30

SMH:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

BBWI:

-0.16

SMH:

1.72

Omega Ratio

BBWI:

0.98

SMH:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

BBWI:

-0.20

SMH:

1.69

Martin Ratio

BBWI:

-0.48

SMH:

4.10

Ulcer Index

BBWI:

26.75%

SMH:

10.27%

Daily Std Dev

BBWI:

43.07%

SMH:

35.05%

Max Drawdown

BBWI:

-88.22%

SMH:

-83.29%

Current Drawdown

BBWI:

-50.01%

SMH:

-12.35%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBWI achieves a -5.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 1.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BBWI has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of -2.26%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 26.27% annualized return.


BBWI

YTD

-5.11%

1M

-3.74%

6M

-3.65%

1Y

-10.99%

5Y*

19.58%

10Y*

-2.26%

SMH

YTD

1.35%

1M

-1.19%

6M

-9.93%

1Y

42.54%

5Y*

28.54%

10Y*

26.27%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BBWI vs. SMH — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBWI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BBWI is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BBWI is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BBWI is 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BBWI is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BBWI is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BBWI is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 5757
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BBWI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BBWI, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.301.20
The chart of Sortino ratio for BBWI, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.161.72
The chart of Omega ratio for BBWI, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.981.22
The chart of Calmar ratio for BBWI, currently valued at -0.20, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.201.69
The chart of Martin ratio for BBWI, currently valued at -0.48, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-0.484.10
BBWI
SMH

The current BBWI Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBWI and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.30
1.20
BBWI
SMH

Dividends

BBWI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

BBWI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than SMH's 0.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
2.17%2.06%1.85%1.90%0.60%0.81%6.62%9.35%3.99%6.68%4.18%2.73%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.44%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%

Drawdowns

BBWI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBWI drawdown since its inception was -88.22%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -83.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBWI and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-50.01%
-12.35%
BBWI
SMH

Volatility

BBWI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) is 6.71%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that BBWI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%20.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.71%
8.69%
BBWI
SMH
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab