LIVE vs. EQT
LIVE (Live Ventures Incorporated) and EQT (EQT Corporation) are both stocks. LIVE operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while EQT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 10 years, LIVE returned -0.63%/yr vs 3.67%/yr for EQT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIVE vs. EQT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIVE achieves a -39.12% return, which is significantly lower than EQT's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, LIVE has underperformed EQT with an annualized return of -0.63%, while EQT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.67% annualized return.
LIVE
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -28.49%
- YTD
- -39.12%
- 6M
- -21.24%
- 1Y
- -39.33%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -31.14%
- 10Y*
- -0.63%
EQT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- -10.92%
- 1Y
- -1.72%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- 21.82%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
LIVE vs. EQT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIVE Live Ventures Incorporated | -39.12% | 58.63% | -63.27% | -18.85% | -0.73% | 153.86% | 65.38% | 11.76% | -57.95% | -33.47% |
EQT EQT Corporation | 0.85% | 17.64% | 21.41% | 16.20% | 57.64% | 71.60% | 17.27% | -41.82% | -38.82% | -12.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIVE and EQT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001 | 0.05 |
The correlation between LIVE and EQT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.06 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LIVE:
$27.68M
EQT:
$33.60B
LIVE:
$0.93
EQT:
$5.40
LIVE:
9.69
EQT:
9.95
LIVE:
0.14
EQT:
0.08
LIVE:
0.09
EQT:
3.32
LIVE:
0.30
EQT:
1.34
LIVE:
$437.87M
EQT:
$10.03B
LIVE:
$145.11M
EQT:
$6.43B
LIVE:
$27.43M
EQT:
$7.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIVE vs. EQT — Risk / Return Rank
LIVE
EQT
LIVE vs. EQT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) and EQT Corporation (EQT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LIVE | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.02 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | -0.08 | -0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -0.16 | -1.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LIVE | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | -0.05 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | 0.51 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 | 0.08 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.30 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
LIVE vs. EQT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIVE drawdown since its inception was -99.76%, which is greater than EQT's maximum drawdown of -91.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIVE and EQT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIVE | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.76% | -91.51% | -8.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.28% | -20.65% | -36.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.13% | -31.62% | -45.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -90.49% | -42.56% | -47.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.49% | -88.28% | -2.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.02% | -20.65% | -78.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.25% | -23.34% | -65.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.71% | 11.02% | +18.69% |
Volatility
LIVE vs. EQT - Volatility Comparison
Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) has a higher volatility of 38.12% compared to EQT Corporation (EQT) at 8.05%. This indicates that LIVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIVE | EQT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.12% | 8.05% | +30.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.31% | 21.29% | +46.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 127.39% | 32.62% | +94.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 85.48% | 42.80% | +42.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.30% | 48.92% | +36.38% |
Dividends
LIVE vs. EQT - Dividend Comparison
LIVE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQT EQT Corporation | 1.21% | 1.19% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.63% | 0.00% | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.42% | 0.21% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
LIVE Live Ventures Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LIVE vs. EQT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Live Ventures Incorporated and EQT Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LIVE vs. EQT - Profitability Comparison
LIVE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Ventures Incorporated reported a gross profit of 34.58M and revenue of 102.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.
EQT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.32B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.4%.
LIVE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Ventures Incorporated reported an operating income of -2.01M and revenue of 102.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.0%.
EQT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported an operating income of 2.04B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.3%.
LIVE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Live Ventures Incorporated reported a net income of -2.45M and revenue of 102.90M, resulting in a net margin of -2.4%.
EQT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, EQT Corporation reported a net income of 1.55B and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of 46.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIVE and EQT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIVE has higher volatility (38.12%) compared to EQT (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIVE dropped -99.76% vs EQT's -91.51%.
EQT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIVE and EQT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer