LITP vs. TPYP
LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and TPYP (Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TPYP is a MLPs fund tracking the Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LITP returned -11.07%/yr vs 23.42%/yr for TPYP. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for TPYP.
Performance
LITP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -12.86% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.
LITP
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -15.83%
- 6M
- -18.86%
- YTD
- -12.86%
- 1Y
- 65.64%
- 3Y*
- -11.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -13.45%
TPYP
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.96%
- YTD
- 20.31%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 18.93%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $291.88K | $314.31K | $845.68K | |
| $2.68M | $2.32M | $2.66M |
LITP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | -12.86% | 94.65% | -43.85% | -36.71% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 20.31% | 7.59% | 37.37% | 6.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and TPYP is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023 | 0.18 |
The correlation between LITP and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LITP vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LITP
TPYP
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
LITP
TPYP
Communication Services
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Cyclical
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Consumer Defensive
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Energy
LITP
-
TPYP
Financial Services
LITP
-
TPYP
Healthcare
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Industrials
LITP
-
TPYP
Real Estate
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Technology
LITP
-
TPYP
-
Utilities
LITP
-
TPYP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
TPYP
LITP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 3.25 | -1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.77 | 7.64 | -3.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and TPYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -51.91% | -23.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.50% | -6.84% | -38.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.42% | -13.17% | -57.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.21% | -5.54% | -36.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -7.82% | -34.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.48% | 2.91% | +14.57% |
Volatility
LITP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | TPYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.49% | 4.74% | +5.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.90% | 11.18% | +27.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.84% | 13.98% | +44.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.55% | 17.41% | +30.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.55% | 21.90% | +25.65% |
LITP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than TPYP's 3.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 8.50% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPYP Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund | 3.28% | 3.91% | 3.95% | 4.83% | 4.48% | 4.86% | 6.14% | 4.45% | 4.58% | 3.71% | 3.49% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITP and TPYP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LITP has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs TPYP's -51.91%.
On 3-year performance, TPYP leads with 23.42% vs -11.07% for LITP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 23.42% return vs -11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.
LITP has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 3.28% for TPYP.
LITP is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while TPYP is MLPs. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.40% for TPYP.
TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LITP and TPYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer