PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LITP vs. TPYP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LITP vs. TPYP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -12.86% return, which is significantly lower than TPYP's 20.31% return.


LITP

1D
0.78%
1M
-15.83%
6M
-18.86%
YTD
-12.86%
1Y
65.64%
3Y*
-11.07%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.45%

TPYP

1D
-1.47%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.96%
YTD
20.31%
1Y
22.13%
3Y*
23.42%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
11.32%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$291.88K$314.31K$845.68K
$2.68M$2.32M$2.66M

LITP vs. TPYP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
-12.86%94.65%-43.85%-36.71%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.31%7.59%37.37%6.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and TPYP is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.18

The correlation between LITP and TPYP shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LITP vs. TPYP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LITP
TPYP

Basic Materials

100.0%
0.1%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

69.6%

Financial Services

-

2.4%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

21.2%

Basic Materials

LITP
100.0%
TPYP
0.1%

Communication Services

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Cyclical

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Consumer Defensive

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Energy

LITP

-

TPYP
69.6%

Financial Services

LITP

-

TPYP
2.4%

Healthcare

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Industrials

LITP

-

TPYP
0.1%

Real Estate

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Technology

LITP

-

TPYP

-

Utilities

LITP

-

TPYP
21.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LITP vs. TPYP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LITP
LITP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITP vs. TPYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LITPTPYPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

3.25

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.77

7.64

-3.87

LITP vs. TPYP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the TPYP Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and TPYP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITP vs. TPYP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than TPYP's maximum drawdown of -51.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and TPYP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LITPTPYPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-51.91%

-23.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.50%

-6.84%

-38.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.42%

-13.17%

-57.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.21%

-5.54%

-36.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-7.82%

-34.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.48%

2.91%

+14.57%

Volatility

LITP vs. TPYP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 10.49% compared to Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) at 4.74%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPYP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LITPTPYPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.49%

4.74%

+5.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.90%

11.18%

+27.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.84%

13.98%

+44.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.55%

17.41%

+30.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.55%

21.90%

+25.65%

LITP vs. TPYP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TPYP's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LITP vs. TPYP - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.50%, more than TPYP's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
8.50%7.41%6.55%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.28%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


LITP and TPYP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LITP has higher volatility (10.49%) compared to TPYP (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs TPYP's -51.91%.

On 3-year performance, TPYP leads with 23.42% vs -11.07% for LITP. On fees, TPYP is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 23.42% return vs -11.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TPYP is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 8.50%, compared with 3.28% for TPYP.

LITP is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while TPYP is MLPs. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Tortoise. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITP and TPYP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer