LITP vs. METL
LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. LITP is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
LITP vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -17.54% return, which is significantly lower than METL's -4.20% return.
LITP
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- -19.49%
- 6M
- -23.27%
- YTD
- -17.54%
- 1Y
- 63.07%
- 3Y*
- -13.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.86%
METL
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -5.60%
- 6M
- -18.65%
- YTD
- -4.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $235.50K | $292.96K | $956.89K | |
| $253.61K | $342.11K | $593.78K |
LITP vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | -17.54% | 64.79% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | -4.20% | 28.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between LITP and METL is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LITP vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
LITP
METL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LITP vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LITP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LITP vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LITP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.94% | -28.80% | -46.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.50% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.32% | -27.36% | -17.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.29% | -10.66% | -31.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.84% | — | — |
Volatility
LITP vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LITP | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.49% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.82% | 43.84% | +14.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.58% | 43.84% | +3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.58% | 43.84% | +3.74% |
LITP vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
LITP vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than METL's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF | 8.98% | 7.41% | 6.55% | 2.80% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 1.04% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LITP and METL have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LITP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LITP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
LITP has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 1.04% for METL.
LITP is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while METL is Natural Resources. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for LITP and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer