GSIB vs. ATMP
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP).
GSIB and ATMP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. ATMP is a passively managed fund by Barclays Capital that tracks the performance of the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. It was launched on Mar 13, 2013.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSIB or ATMP.
Correlation
The correlation between GSIB and ATMP is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GSIB vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSIB:
1.07
ATMP:
0.85
GSIB:
1.41
ATMP:
1.14
GSIB:
1.20
ATMP:
1.17
GSIB:
1.25
ATMP:
1.12
GSIB:
7.15
ATMP:
5.00
GSIB:
2.91%
ATMP:
3.22%
GSIB:
19.49%
ATMP:
19.05%
GSIB:
-16.70%
ATMP:
-72.93%
GSIB:
-16.70%
ATMP:
-14.36%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly higher than ATMP's -4.07% return.
GSIB
-0.94%
-14.30%
5.27%
20.65%
N/A
N/A
ATMP
-4.07%
-7.76%
2.89%
16.00%
34.82%
6.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIB vs. ATMP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ATMP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSIB vs. ATMP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSIB
ATMP
GSIB vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSIB vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than ATMP's 5.00% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.68% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 5.00% | 4.72% | 5.62% | 5.50% | 8.75% | 14.62% | 8.48% | 6.51% | 5.56% | 5.47% | 8.02% | 3.56% |
Drawdowns
GSIB vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -16.70%, smaller than the maximum ATMP drawdown of -72.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and ATMP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSIB vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) have volatilities of 10.85% and 10.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.