GSIB vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
GSIB and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSIB or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between GSIB and XLF is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GSIB vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSIB:
1.15
XLF:
0.43
GSIB:
1.50
XLF:
0.67
GSIB:
1.22
XLF:
1.10
GSIB:
1.45
XLF:
0.52
GSIB:
8.20
XLF:
2.47
GSIB:
2.71%
XLF:
3.15%
GSIB:
19.38%
XLF:
18.09%
GSIB:
-15.33%
XLF:
-82.43%
GSIB:
-15.33%
XLF:
-15.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -8.21% return.
GSIB
0.68%
-13.23%
7.62%
22.78%
N/A
N/A
XLF
-8.21%
-11.65%
-2.41%
9.01%
19.88%
13.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIB vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSIB vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSIB
XLF
GSIB vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSIB vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than XLF's 1.61% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.61% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
GSIB vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSIB vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 10.33%. This indicates that GSIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.