GSIB vs. PCGG
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG).
GSIB and PCGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GSIB is an actively managed fund by Themes. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. PCGG is an actively managed fund by Polen. It was launched on Aug 29, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GSIB or PCGG.
Correlation
The correlation between GSIB and PCGG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GSIB vs. PCGG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GSIB:
1.15
PCGG:
-0.54
GSIB:
1.50
PCGG:
-0.60
GSIB:
1.22
PCGG:
0.92
GSIB:
1.45
PCGG:
-0.48
GSIB:
8.20
PCGG:
-2.17
GSIB:
2.71%
PCGG:
3.95%
GSIB:
19.38%
PCGG:
15.89%
GSIB:
-15.33%
PCGG:
-18.00%
GSIB:
-15.33%
PCGG:
-18.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GSIB achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than PCGG's -13.16% return.
GSIB
0.68%
-12.89%
7.62%
22.63%
N/A
N/A
PCGG
-13.16%
-12.86%
-10.66%
-8.42%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GSIB vs. PCGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
GSIB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PCGG's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GSIB vs. PCGG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GSIB
PCGG
GSIB vs. PCGG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) and Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GSIB vs. PCGG - Dividend Comparison
GSIB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|
GSIB Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF | 1.66% | 1.67% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GSIB vs. PCGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GSIB drawdown since its inception was -15.33%, smaller than the maximum PCGG drawdown of -18.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GSIB and PCGG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GSIB vs. PCGG - Volatility Comparison
Themes Global Systemically Important Banks ETF (GSIB) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) at 8.49%. This indicates that GSIB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.