LIF vs. AJG
LIF (Life360, Inc.) and AJG (Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.) are both stocks. LIF operates in Software - Application (Technology), while AJG operates in Insurance Brokers (Financial Services). Over the past year, LIF returned -25.93% vs -30.16% for AJG. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LIF vs. AJG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LIF achieves a -29.45% return, which is significantly lower than AJG's -14.95% return.
LIF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 17.44%
- YTD
- -29.45%
- 6M
- -33.03%
- 1Y
- -25.93%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AJG
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 9.74%
- YTD
- -14.95%
- 6M
- -13.82%
- 1Y
- -30.16%
- 3Y*
- 2.53%
- 5Y*
- 9.77%
- 10Y*
- 18.56%
LIF vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LIF Life360, Inc. | -29.45% | 55.42% | 58.73% |
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | -14.95% | -8.03% | 12.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between LIF and AJG is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2024 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
LIF:
$1.75
AJG:
$5.74
LIF:
25.86
AJG:
38.12
LIF:
7.30
AJG:
4.08
LIF:
$528.98M
AJG:
$13.94B
LIF:
$407.86M
AJG:
$7.63B
LIF:
$26.53M
AJG:
$3.66B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LIF vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank
LIF
AJG
LIF vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life360, Inc. (LIF) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LIF | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.81 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | -0.76 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -1.30 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LIF vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LIF drawdown since its inception was -65.64%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LIF and AJG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LIF | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.64% | -57.49% | -8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -65.64% | -40.64% | -25.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -44.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.19% | -36.46% | -22.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.35% | -12.83% | -8.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.82% | 23.87% | +16.95% |
Volatility
LIF vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison
Life360, Inc. (LIF) has a higher volatility of 16.67% compared to Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) at 8.37%. This indicates that LIF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LIF | AJG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.67% | 8.37% | +8.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 52.85% | 22.48% | +30.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 27.85% | +39.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 22.98% | +39.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.97% | 23.08% | +39.89% |
Dividends
LIF vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison
LIF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AJG Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. | 1.23% | 1.00% | 0.85% | 0.98% | 1.08% | 1.13% | 1.46% | 1.81% | 2.23% | 2.47% | 2.93% | 3.62% |
LIF Life360, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LIF vs. AJG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life360, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LIF vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison
LIF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.56M and revenue of 143.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.3%.
AJG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.
LIF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported an operating income of -8.08M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.6%.
AJG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.
LIF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life360, Inc. reported a net income of 2.78M and revenue of 143.12M, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
AJG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LIF and AJG have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LIF has higher volatility (16.67%) compared to AJG (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LIF dropped -65.64% vs AJG's -57.49%.
LIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.43 vs -1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LIF and AJG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer