LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE
LHKG.DE (Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist) and DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds - LHKG.DE tracks the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders while DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LHKG.DE returned -4.31%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for DBX9.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LHKG.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBX9.DE.
Performance
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -13.82% return, which is significantly lower than DBX9.DE's 15.56% return.
LHKG.DE
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- YTD
- -13.82%
- 6M
- -13.20%
- 1Y
- -4.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- -4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 0.61%
- 10Y*
- 4.72%
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | -13.82% | 21.50% | 20.39% | -17.50% | -7.92% | -6.59% | -10.39% | 3.35% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 15.56% | 10.03% | 37.71% | -16.44% | -13.64% | -14.99% | -0.86% | 4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHKG.DE and DBX9.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2019 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LHKG.DE and DBX9.DE has dropped to 0.60 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LHKG.DE
DBX9.DE
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LHKG.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.42 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 5.97 | -6.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 15.49 | -15.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -45.12%, smaller than the maximum DBX9.DE drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and DBX9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LHKG.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.12% | -66.51% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.08% | -6.62% | -15.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | -27.85% | +1.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.09% | -47.60% | +4.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.83% | -10.16% | -12.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.18% | -29.44% | +10.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 2.55% | +7.58% |
Volatility
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) at 5.99%. This indicates that LHKG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LHKG.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 5.99% | +1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 11.34% | +3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.87% | 16.50% | +3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.96% | 27.23% | -2.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 24.52% | -0.53% |
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LHKG.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Dividend Comparison
LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, while DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 1.75% | 1.50% | 2.18% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LHKG.DE and DBX9.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LHKG.DE.
LHKG.DE tracks MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders, while DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LHKG.DE and 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
Find the right allocation for LHKG.DE and DBX9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer