LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L).
LHKG.DE and LCCN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LHKG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. LCCN.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China NR USD. It was launched on Jul 5, 2018. Both LHKG.DE and LCCN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LHKG.DE or LCCN.L.
Key characteristics
| LHKG.DE | LCCN.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.46% | 19.77% |
| 1Y Return | 7.27% | 16.54% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -6.50% | -9.53% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -4.64% | -1.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.34 | 0.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.72 | 1.05 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.13 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.20 | 0.28 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.88 | 1.63 |
| Ulcer Index | 10.31% | 10.23% |
| Daily Std Dev | 26.99% | 28.68% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.71% | -62.38% |
| Current Drawdown | -28.71% | -46.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LHKG.DE and LCCN.L is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly lower than LCCN.L's 19.77% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LCCN.L's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Dividend Comparison
LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while LCCN.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist | 0.14% | 0.17% | 3.78% | 1.35% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 3.04% | 2.30% | 3.38% | 3.88% | 3.19% | 3.42% |
LCCN.L Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.71%, smaller than the maximum LCCN.L drawdown of -62.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and LCCN.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LHKG.DE vs. LCCN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) is 11.08%, while Lyxor MSCI China UCITS ETF - Acc (LCCN.L) has a volatility of 12.10%. This indicates that LHKG.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCCN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.