LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE).

LHKG.DE and 36BZ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LHKG.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI China Select ESG Rating and Trend Leaders. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023. 36BZ.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Inclusion. It was launched on Apr 8, 2015. Both LHKG.DE and 36BZ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	-7.49%	21.50%	20.37%	-17.49%	-7.90%	-6.59%	-10.39%	16.35%	-8.73%	22.42%
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.18%	10.25%	19.91%	-17.13%	-21.26%	13.41%	28.50%	37.21%	-23.49%	14.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LHKG.DE achieves a -7.49% return, which is significantly lower than 36BZ.DE's 0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, LHKG.DE has underperformed 36BZ.DE with an annualized return of 2.79%, while 36BZ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 4.39% annualized return.

LHKG.DE

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: -7.49%
• 6M: -16.35%
• 1Y: -1.12%
• 3Y*: 3.73%
• 5Y*: -2.82%
• 10Y*: 2.79%

36BZ.DE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -1.65%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: 1.00%
• 1Y: 16.97%
• 3Y*: 2.24%
• 5Y*: -1.07%
• 10Y*: 4.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LHKG.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.

LHKG.DE

Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist

36BZ.DE

iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LHKG.DE

LHKG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
LHKG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LHKG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LHKG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LHKG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 12

36BZ.DE

36BZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 60
36BZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
36BZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
36BZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 47
36BZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
36BZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LHKG.DE	36BZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	1.00	-1.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	1.39	-1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.20	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	3.15	-3.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.33	7.55	-7.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LHKG.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the 36BZ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LHKG.DE and 36BZ.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LHKG.DE	36BZ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	1.00	-1.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	-0.05	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.20	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	-0.01	+0.13

Correlation

The correlation between LHKG.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LHKG.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, while 36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LHKG.DE Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist	1.63%	1.50%	2.18%	0.17%	3.78%	1.35%	2.46%	2.58%	3.04%	2.30%	3.38%	3.88%
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LHKG.DE drawdown since its inception was -58.71%, which is greater than 36BZ.DE's maximum drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LHKG.DE and 36BZ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LHKG.DE	36BZ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.71%	-53.30%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.16%	-8.59%	-8.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.07%	-41.94%	-1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.11%	-43.38%	-1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.17%	-18.02%	+0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.87%	-30.47%	+10.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.06%	2.74%	+4.32%

Volatility

LHKG.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor MSCI China ESG Leaders Extra UCITS ETF Dist (LHKG.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) at 4.67%. This indicates that LHKG.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LHKG.DE	36BZ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	4.67%	+1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.74%	11.41%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.65%	16.85%	+5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.72%	21.40%	+3.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.45%	22.22%	+0.23%