LGLIX vs. FKDNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LGLIX (Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX returned 18.20%/yr vs 18.38%/yr for FKDNX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LGLIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.

Performance

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 13.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLIX having a 18.20% annualized return and FKDNX not far ahead at 18.38%.

LGLIX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 6.80%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 9.03%
• 1Y: 26.45%
• 3Y*: 28.69%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 18.20%

FKDNX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 7.25%
• YTD: 13.49%
• 6M: 12.49%
• 1Y: 30.72%
• 3Y*: 25.84%
• 5Y*: 11.35%
• 10Y*: 18.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	10.47%	16.49%	44.97%	33.29%	-38.73%	8.62%	77.55%	35.02%	-1.08%	31.64%
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	13.49%	18.59%	30.57%	44.42%	-40.30%	12.53%	57.68%	36.36%	2.85%	39.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLIX and FKDNX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2011	0.96

The correlation between LGLIX and FKDNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LGLIX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLIX

LGLIX Risk / Return Rank: 17
LGLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
LGLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LGLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
LGLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
LGLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FKDNX

FKDNX Risk / Return Rank: 23
FKDNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
FKDNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FKDNX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
FKDNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FKDNX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LGLIX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.55	-0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	2.07	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.27	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	1.54	-0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.76	4.79	-1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the FKDNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and FKDNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LGLIX	FKDNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.30	1.55	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.44	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.75	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.67	+0.03

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and FKDNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGLIX	FKDNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.95%	-51.63%	+5.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.01%	-20.49%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.25%	-26.23%	-3.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.95%	-48.28%	+2.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.95%	-48.28%	+2.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.34%	-11.25%	+1.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.27%	6.57%	+0.70%

Volatility

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) at 4.76%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGLIX	FKDNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.23%	4.76%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	15.85%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.07%	20.38%	+0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.84%	26.21%	-0.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.79%	24.61%	+0.18%

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGLIX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than FKDNX's 9.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund	9.84%	11.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.43%	0.00%	0.74%	2.92%	1.77%	3.55%	2.46%
LGLIX Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund	1.80%	1.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	23.83%	9.27%	8.01%	19.82%	6.46%	0.00%	4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGLIX and FKDNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, LGLIX and FKDNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LGLIX or FKDNX?

LGLIX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to FKDNX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLIX dropped -45.95% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKDNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.