LGLIX vs. GFFFX

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than GFFFX's 3.36% return. Over the past 10 years, LGLIX has outperformed GFFFX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while GFFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than GFFFX's 0.40% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is comparable to the GFFFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and GFFFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GFFFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.93%.

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, roughly equal to the maximum GFFFX drawdown of -44.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and GFFFX.

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to American Funds The Growth Fund of America (GFFFX) at 5.48%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.