LGLIX vs. FCNTX

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 46.69% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 35.58% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLIX having a 8.57% annualized return and FCNTX not far ahead at 8.71%.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLIX and FCNTX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.73%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.35% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 4.78%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.