PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LGLIX vs. FCNTX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LGLIXFCNTX
YTD Return23.26%27.87%
1Y Return36.65%38.36%
3Y Return (Ann)0.04%10.26%
5Y Return (Ann)16.14%18.32%
10Y Return (Ann)14.34%14.93%
Sharpe Ratio1.602.45
Daily Std Dev22.59%15.58%
Max Drawdown-55.73%-99.93%
Current Drawdown-25.67%-98.79%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between LGLIX and FCNTX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LGLIX achieves a 23.26% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 27.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLIX having a 14.34% annualized return and FCNTX not far ahead at 14.93%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
3.38%
7.76%
LGLIX
FCNTX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.


LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
Expense ratio chart for LGLIX: current value at 0.64% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.64%
Expense ratio chart for FCNTX: current value at 0.39% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.39%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) and Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLIX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 1.60, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.001.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 2.15, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.16
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 0.72, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.72
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LGLIX, currently valued at 8.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.59
FCNTX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 2.45, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.005.002.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 3.29, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.44
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 2.74, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.74
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FCNTX, currently valued at 14.35, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0014.35

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of LGLIX and FCNTX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.60
2.45
LGLIX
FCNTX

Dividends

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

LGLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FCNTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LGLIX
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%23.83%9.27%9.03%19.82%6.46%0.00%4.84%5.82%6.37%
FCNTX
Fidelity Contrafund Fund
2.49%4.26%13.65%10.80%8.01%4.16%9.14%6.17%3.81%5.33%7.54%7.90%

Drawdowns

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.73%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLIX and FCNTX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-25.67%
-1.91%
LGLIX
FCNTX

Volatility

LGLIX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Growth Leaders Fund (LGLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Fidelity Contrafund Fund (FCNTX) at 4.73%. This indicates that LGLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
7.28%
4.73%
LGLIX
FCNTX