PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFVN vs. ZIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZIVO's -53.10% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed ZIVO with an annualized return of -6.90%, while ZIVO has yielded a comparatively higher 29.77% annualized return.


LFVN

1D
0.97%
1M
-2.34%
6M
0.34%
YTD
3.27%
1Y
-50.44%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
-6.90%
ALL TIME*
-5.21%

ZIVO

1D
-1.45%
1M
10.57%
6M
-54.67%
YTD
-53.10%
1Y
-69.21%
3Y*
-28.50%
5Y*
-28.19%
10Y*
29.77%
ALL TIME*
11.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
3.27%-64.29%197.21%74.03%-39.78%-32.19%-40.29%18.35%177.10%-41.60%
ZIVO
ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.
-53.10%-59.53%1,691.67%-92.00%-12.89%1,813.33%-11.76%30.77%44.44%-5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between LFVN and ZIVO is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012

-0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFVN:

$78.98M

ZIVO:

$15.52M

EPS

LFVN:

$0.45

ZIVO:

-$1.70

PS Ratio

LFVN:

0.41

ZIVO:

133.72

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFVN:

$195.32M

ZIVO:

$119.03K

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFVN:

$152.62M

ZIVO:

$39.21K

EBITDA (TTM)

LFVN:

$8.69M

ZIVO:

-$6.59M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFVN vs. ZIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFVN
LFVN Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
LFVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFVN Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
LFVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFVN Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIVO
ZIVO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ZIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ZIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LFVNZIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.05

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.74

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

-1.24

+0.26

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFVN Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the ZIVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFVN and ZIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum ZIVO drawdown of -98.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and ZIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFVNZIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-98.52%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.73%

-93.85%

+22.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.90%

-96.18%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.90%

-98.52%

+14.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.90%

-98.52%

+14.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.58%

-87.52%

-6.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.58%

-63.92%

-25.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.56%

55.88%

-4.32%

Volatility

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) is 12.63%, while ZIVO Bioscience, Inc. (ZIVO) has a volatility of 61.64%. This indicates that LFVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFVNZIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.63%

61.64%

-49.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.07%

139.68%

-71.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

76.93%

183.76%

-106.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.98%

141.73%

-75.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.91%

1,083.05%

-1,021.14%

Dividends

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Dividend Comparison

LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, while ZIVO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LFVN
LifeVantage Corporation
2.96%2.84%0.88%8.33%2.42%
ZIVO
ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

LFVN vs. ZIVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and ZIVO Bioscience, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.72M
0
(LFVN) Total Revenue
(ZIVO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LFVN and ZIVO have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZIVO has higher volatility (61.64%) compared to LFVN (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs ZIVO's -98.52%.

ZIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.38 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFVN and ZIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer