LFVN vs. UCBJY
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and UCBJY (UCB SA ADR) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while UCBJY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LFVN returned -6.90%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for UCBJY. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than UCBJY's -2.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LFVN has underperformed UCBJY with an annualized return of -6.90%, while UCBJY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.80% annualized return.
LFVN
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 3.27%
- 1Y
- -50.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.89%
- 5Y*
- -1.32%
- 10Y*
- -6.90%
- ALL TIME*
- -5.21%
UCBJY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- 6M
- -11.64%
- YTD
- -2.83%
- 1Y
- 34.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.86%
- 5Y*
- 21.52%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.85%
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 3.27% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | -41.60% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | -2.83% | 42.69% | 129.19% | 12.67% | -30.04% | 6.90% | 34.46% | -1.59% | 9.33% | 21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and UCBJY is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2009 | 0.05 |
The correlation between LFVN and UCBJY shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$78.98M
UCBJY:
$51.37B
LFVN:
$0.45
UCBJY:
€6.73
LFVN:
13.91
UCBJY:
17.55
LFVN:
0.34
UCBJY:
0.39
LFVN:
0.41
UCBJY:
3.31
LFVN:
2.38
UCBJY:
4.22
LFVN:
$195.32M
UCBJY:
€13.86B
LFVN:
$152.62M
UCBJY:
€10.00B
LFVN:
$8.69M
UCBJY:
€4.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. UCBJY — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
UCBJY
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and UCB SA ADR (UCBJY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFVN | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.20 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 1.57 | -2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 3.44 | -4.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than UCBJY's maximum drawdown of -50.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and UCBJY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -50.32% | -49.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -21.77% | -49.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -28.58% | -55.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -46.82% | -37.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | -50.32% | -33.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.58% | -19.26% | -74.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.58% | -13.15% | -76.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.56% | 9.92% | +41.64% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Volatility Comparison
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 12.63% compared to UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) at 9.05%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCBJY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | UCBJY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.63% | 9.05% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.07% | 24.67% | +43.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.93% | 35.68% | +41.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.98% | 30.38% | +35.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.91% | 30.70% | +31.21% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.96%, more than UCBJY's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.96% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.73% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 0.86% | 0.78% | 1.06% | 1.10% | 2.71% | 3.21% |
Financials
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and UCB SA ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFVN vs. UCBJY - Profitability Comparison
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
UCBJY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
UCBJY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
UCBJY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a net income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and UCBJY have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (12.63%) compared to UCBJY (9.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs UCBJY's -50.32%.
UCBJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and UCBJY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer