UCBJY vs. EAT
UCBJY (UCB SA ADR) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. UCBJY operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, UCBJY returned 16.48%/yr vs 15.45%/yr for EAT. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UCBJY vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCBJY achieves a 4.04% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 18.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UCBJY has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 16.48%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 15.45% annualized return.
UCBJY
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 4.04%
- 6M
- 4.51%
- 1Y
- 50.68%
- 3Y*
- 48.14%
- 5Y*
- 24.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.48%
EAT
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- 23.62%
- YTD
- 18.36%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- -5.63%
- 3Y*
- 70.87%
- 5Y*
- 23.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.45%
UCBJY vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 4.04% | 42.69% | 129.19% | 12.67% | -30.04% | 6.90% | 34.46% | -1.59% | 9.33% | 21.37% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 18.36% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between UCBJY and EAT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2009 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
UCBJY:
$56.11B
EAT:
$7.56B
UCBJY:
€6.73
EAT:
$10.20
UCBJY:
18.89
EAT:
16.65
UCBJY:
0.42
EAT:
0.38
UCBJY:
3.56
EAT:
1.34
UCBJY:
4.55
EAT:
18.62
UCBJY:
€13.86B
EAT:
$5.73B
UCBJY:
€10.00B
EAT:
$3.45B
UCBJY:
€4.56B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UCBJY vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
UCBJY
EAT
UCBJY vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UCBJY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.02 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | -0.13 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | -0.26 | +5.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UCBJY vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCBJY drawdown since its inception was -50.32%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCBJY and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCBJY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.32% | -88.40% | +38.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.77% | -44.41% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.58% | -45.92% | +17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.82% | -65.54% | +18.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.32% | -84.94% | +34.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.54% | -10.19% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.14% | -24.33% | +11.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.07% | 21.87% | -12.80% |
Volatility
UCBJY vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UCB SA ADR (UCBJY) is 10.04%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 12.16%. This indicates that UCBJY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UCBJY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 12.16% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.53% | 36.40% | -11.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.90% | 47.23% | -12.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.32% | 48.99% | -18.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 55.19% | -24.50% |
Dividends
UCBJY vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
UCBJY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
UCBJY UCB SA ADR | 0.59% | 0.57% | 0.73% | 1.67% | 1.79% | 0.86% | 0.78% | 1.06% | 1.10% | 2.71% | 3.21% | 0.00% |
Financials
UCBJY vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UCB SA ADR and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UCBJY vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
UCBJY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a gross profit of 3.04B and revenue of 4.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.9%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
UCBJY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported an operating income of 1.28B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
UCBJY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UCB SA ADR reported a net income of 1.07B and revenue of 4.22B, resulting in a net margin of 25.5%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UCBJY and EAT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (12.16%) compared to UCBJY (10.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCBJY dropped -50.32% vs EAT's -88.40%.
UCBJY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UCBJY and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer