LFVN vs. ASCCY
LFVN (LifeVantage Corporation) and ASCCY (Asics Corp ADR) are both stocks. LFVN operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ASCCY operates in Footwear & Accessories (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, LFVN returned 0.84%/yr vs 33.87%/yr for ASCCY. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFVN achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than ASCCY's 9.41% return.
LFVN
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 11.76%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- -47.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.62%
- 5Y*
- 0.84%
- 10Y*
- -5.85%
ASCCY
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -8.28%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 4.35%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 54.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.87%
- 10Y*
- —
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.78% | -64.29% | 197.21% | 74.03% | -39.78% | -32.19% | -40.29% | 18.35% | 177.10% | 2.81% |
ASCCY Asics Corp ADR | 9.41% | 21.77% | 152.83% | 43.48% | 1.37% | 10.10% | 18.67% | 27.61% | -13.67% | -0.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFVN and ASCCY is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
LFVN:
$78.87M
ASCCY:
$18.55B
LFVN:
$0.45
ASCCY:
¥161.60
LFVN:
13.94
ASCCY:
26.17
LFVN:
0.34
ASCCY:
0.31
LFVN:
0.41
ASCCY:
3.41
LFVN:
2.37
ASCCY:
9.44
LFVN:
$195.32M
ASCCY:
¥885.06B
LFVN:
$152.62M
ASCCY:
¥476.81B
LFVN:
$8.69M
ASCCY:
¥190.22B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFVN vs. ASCCY — Risk / Return Rank
LFVN
ASCCY
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFVN | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.08 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.47 | -1.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 0.86 | -1.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFVN drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than ASCCY's maximum drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFVN and ASCCY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFVN | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -64.92% | -34.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.73% | -20.82% | -50.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.90% | -27.09% | -56.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.90% | -47.44% | -36.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.61% | -18.15% | -75.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.57% | -18.11% | -71.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.55% | 11.45% | +38.10% |
Volatility
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Volatility Comparison
LifeVantage Corporation (LFVN) has a higher volatility of 52.82% compared to Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) at 9.99%. This indicates that LFVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASCCY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFVN | ASCCY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.82% | 9.99% | +42.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.93% | 29.27% | +39.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 77.47% | 40.78% | +36.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.39% | 44.93% | +21.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.12% | 47.02% | +15.10% |
Dividends
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Dividend Comparison
LFVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than ASCCY's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASCCY Asics Corp ADR | 0.31% | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFVN LifeVantage Corporation | 2.97% | 2.84% | 0.88% | 8.33% | 2.42% |
Financials
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LifeVantage Corporation and Asics Corp ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LFVN vs. ASCCY - Profitability Comparison
LFVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a gross profit of 34.54M and revenue of 43.72M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
ASCCY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.
LFVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported an operating income of 1.68M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.8%.
ASCCY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.
LFVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, LifeVantage Corporation reported a net income of 1.36M and revenue of 43.72M, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
ASCCY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LFVN and ASCCY have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LFVN has higher volatility (52.82%) compared to ASCCY (9.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFVN dropped -99.57% vs ASCCY's -64.92%.
ASCCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFVN and ASCCY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer