PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASCCY vs. DECK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ASCCY vs. DECK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASCCY achieves a 17.66% return, which is significantly higher than DECK's 3.56% return.


ASCCY

1D
-4.68%
1M
2.65%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.70%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
58.82%
5Y*
35.84%
10Y*

DECK

1D
-3.10%
1M
9.94%
YTD
3.56%
6M
13.05%
1Y
1.45%
3Y*
10.55%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
28.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASCCY vs. DECK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
17.66%21.77%152.83%43.48%1.37%10.10%18.67%27.61%-13.67%-0.86%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
3.56%-48.95%82.30%67.46%8.97%27.73%69.83%31.97%59.44%16.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ASCCY and DECK is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2017

0.15

The correlation between ASCCY and DECK shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.26 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ASCCY:

$19.94B

DECK:

$15.19B

EPS

ASCCY:

$161.60

DECK:

$6.98

PE Ratio

ASCCY:

0.17

DECK:

15.38

PEG Ratio

ASCCY:

0.00

DECK:

0.56

PS Ratio

ASCCY:

0.02

DECK:

2.88

PB Ratio

ASCCY:

0.06

DECK:

6.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

ASCCY:

$885.06B

DECK:

$5.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ASCCY:

$476.81B

DECK:

$3.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

ASCCY:

$190.22B

DECK:

$1.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASCCY vs. DECK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASCCY
ASCCY Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ASCCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCCY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

DECK
DECK Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
DECK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DECK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DECK Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
DECK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
DECK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASCCY vs. DECK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ASCCYDECKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

0.03

+0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.89

0.39

+0.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.05

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

0.04

+0.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.43

0.09

+1.35

ASCCY vs. DECK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASCCY Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is higher than the DECK Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASCCY and DECK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ASCCYDECKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

0.03

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.34

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.24

+0.38

Drawdowns

ASCCY vs. DECK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASCCY drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum DECK drawdown of -94.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASCCY and DECK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASCCYDECKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.92%

-94.36%

+29.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.82%

-35.81%

+14.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.09%

-64.35%

+37.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.44%

-64.35%

+16.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.99%

-51.88%

+39.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.14%

-40.35%

+22.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.97%

16.89%

-5.92%

Volatility

ASCCY vs. DECK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) is 10.94%, while Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) has a volatility of 12.52%. This indicates that ASCCY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DECK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASCCYDECKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.94%

12.52%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.65%

31.20%

-2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.97%

45.35%

-4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.84%

43.98%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.11%

42.46%

+4.65%

Dividends

ASCCY vs. DECK - Dividend Comparison

ASCCY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while DECK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
0.29%0.34%0.69%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ASCCY vs. DECK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Asics Corp ADR and Deckers Outdoor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
275.23B
1.12B
(ASCCY) Total Revenue
(DECK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ASCCY vs. DECK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Asics Corp ADR and Deckers Outdoor Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

48.0%50.0%52.0%54.0%56.0%58.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
51.8%
57.6%
Portfolio components
ASCCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

DECK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a gross profit of 644.64M and revenue of 1.12B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.6%.

ASCCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

DECK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported an operating income of 156.73M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

ASCCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.

DECK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Deckers Outdoor Corporation reported a net income of 135.57M and revenue of 1.12B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ASCCY and DECK have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DECK has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to ASCCY (10.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASCCY dropped -64.92% vs DECK's -94.36%.

ASCCY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASCCY and DECK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer