LEU vs. EMA
LEU (Centrus Energy Corp.) and EMA (Emera Inc) are both stocks. LEU operates in Uranium (Energy), while EMA operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past year, LEU returned 14.42% vs 20.76% for EMA. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
LEU vs. EMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEU achieves a -32.55% return, which is significantly lower than EMA's 5.65% return.
LEU
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -21.02%
- YTD
- -32.55%
- 6M
- -39.02%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 71.98%
- 5Y*
- 44.90%
- 10Y*
- 46.90%
EMA
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 10.36%
- 1Y
- 20.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEU vs. EMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | -32.55% | 89.86% |
EMA Emera Inc | 5.65% | 11.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEU and EMA is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2025 | -0.08 |
Fundamentals
LEU:
$3.68B
EMA:
$15.54B
LEU:
$2.89
EMA:
$3.55
LEU:
56.59
EMA:
14.37
LEU:
7.58
EMA:
1.79
LEU:
4.74
EMA:
1.69
LEU:
$452.30M
EMA:
$8.59B
LEU:
$116.10M
EMA:
$2.83B
LEU:
$70.50M
EMA:
$2.56B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEU vs. EMA — Risk / Return Rank
LEU
EMA
LEU vs. EMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) and Emera Inc (EMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEU | EMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.27 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 3.52 | -3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 9.44 | -9.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEU | EMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 1.54 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 1.38 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
LEU vs. EMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEU drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than EMA's maximum drawdown of -5.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEU and EMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEU | EMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.98% | -5.93% | -94.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.89% | -5.93% | -56.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.58% | -4.74% | -92.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.98% | -1.76% | -72.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.75% | 2.20% | +35.55% |
Volatility
LEU vs. EMA - Volatility Comparison
Centrus Energy Corp. (LEU) has a higher volatility of 22.37% compared to Emera Inc (EMA) at 4.67%. This indicates that LEU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEU | EMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.37% | 4.67% | +17.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.68% | 10.21% | +55.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.10% | 13.60% | +77.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 86.24% | 13.72% | +72.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 82.26% | 13.72% | +68.54% |
Dividends
LEU vs. EMA - Dividend Comparison
LEU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EMA Emera Inc | 3.87% | 2.12% |
LEU Centrus Energy Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LEU vs. EMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrus Energy Corp. and Emera Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEU vs. EMA - Profitability Comparison
LEU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a gross profit of 31.50M and revenue of 76.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.1%.
EMA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a gross profit of 756.95M and revenue of 2.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
LEU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported an operating income of 800.00K and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
EMA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported an operating income of 626.62M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.
LEU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Centrus Energy Corp. reported a net income of 10.00M and revenue of 76.70M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
EMA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emera Inc reported a net income of 583.50M and revenue of 2.48B, resulting in a net margin of 23.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEU and EMA have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEU has higher volatility (22.37%) compared to EMA (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEU dropped -99.98% vs EMA's -5.93%.
EMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEU and EMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer