PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LESL vs. SLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LESL vs. SLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and SLM Corporation (SLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LESL achieves a 183.03% return, which is significantly higher than SLM's -19.57% return.


LESL

1D
18.23%
1M
199.36%
YTD
183.03%
6M
65.02%
1Y
-70.64%
3Y*
-71.66%
5Y*
-62.07%
10Y*

SLM

1D
-1.95%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-19.57%
6M
-27.38%
1Y
-32.54%
3Y*
12.18%
5Y*
3.86%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LESL vs. SLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
183.03%-96.30%-67.73%-43.41%-48.39%-14.74%27.88%
SLM
SLM Corporation
-19.57%-0.20%47.25%18.70%-13.47%60.54%33.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LESL and SLM is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.29

The correlation between LESL and SLM shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LESL:

$43.56M

SLM:

$4.28B

EPS

LESL:

-$29.76

SLM:

$3.63

PS Ratio

LESL:

0.04

SLM:

1.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

LESL:

$1.22B

SLM:

$2.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LESL:

$428.40M

SLM:

$1.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

LESL:

-$176.53M

SLM:

$599.19M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LESL vs. SLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LESL
LESL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LESL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LESL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

SLM
SLM Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLM Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLM Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LESL vs. SLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and SLM Corporation (SLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LESLSLMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.37

-0.88

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.12

-1.04

+1.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.85

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

-0.72

-0.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.93

-1.34

+0.41

LESL vs. SLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is higher than the SLM Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LESL and SLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LESLSLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

-0.88

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

0.11

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

0.24

-0.78

Drawdowns

LESL vs. SLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LESL drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than SLM's maximum drawdown of -94.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LESL and SLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LESLSLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.85%

-94.50%

-5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.21%

-45.06%

-49.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.58%

-45.06%

-54.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.85%

-45.06%

-54.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.25%

-36.19%

-63.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.39%

-29.89%

-35.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

76.14%

24.28%

+51.86%

Volatility

LESL vs. SLM - Volatility Comparison

Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) has a higher volatility of 98.93% compared to SLM Corporation (SLM) at 7.55%. This indicates that LESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LESLSLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

98.93%

7.55%

+91.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

129.18%

32.13%

+97.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.67%

36.99%

+153.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.69%

35.79%

+70.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.46%

36.87%

+65.59%

Dividends

LESL vs. SLM - Dividend Comparison

LESL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SLM
SLM Corporation
2.41%1.92%1.67%2.30%2.65%1.02%0.97%1.35%

Financials

LESL vs. SLM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leslie's, Inc. and SLM Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
184.74M
0
(LESL) Total Revenue
(SLM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LESL and SLM have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LESL has higher volatility (98.93%) compared to SLM (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LESL dropped -99.85% vs SLM's -94.50%.

LESL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.37 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LESL and SLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer