LESL vs. ENVA
LESL (Leslie's, Inc.) and ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) are both stocks. LESL operates in Home Improvement Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while ENVA operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, LESL returned -55.29%/yr vs 43.15%/yr for ENVA. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LESL vs. ENVA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LESL achieves a 498.79% return, which is significantly higher than ENVA's 34.22% return.
LESL
- 1D
- 6.93%
- 1M
- 186.38%
- YTD
- 498.79%
- 6M
- 498.79%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- -62.53%
- 5Y*
- -55.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ENVA
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- 33.95%
- YTD
- 34.22%
- 6M
- 29.33%
- 1Y
- 111.46%
- 3Y*
- 59.57%
- 5Y*
- 43.15%
- 10Y*
- 40.24%
LESL vs. ENVA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LESL Leslie's, Inc. | 498.79% | -96.30% | -67.73% | -43.41% | -48.39% | -14.74% | 34.71% |
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 34.22% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 47.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between LESL and ENVA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.29 |
The correlation between LESL and ENVA shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LESL:
$92.15M
ENVA:
$5.56B
LESL:
-$29.76
ENVA:
$12.29
LESL:
0.08
ENVA:
1.71
LESL:
$1.22B
ENVA:
$3.28B
LESL:
$428.40M
ENVA:
$1.23B
LESL:
-$176.53M
ENVA:
$456.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LESL vs. ENVA — Risk / Return Rank
LESL
ENVA
LESL vs. ENVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and Enova International, Inc. (ENVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LESL | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.44 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 4.53 | -4.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 11.69 | -11.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LESL vs. ENVA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LESL drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than ENVA's maximum drawdown of -84.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LESL and ENVA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LESL | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.85% | -84.26% | -15.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -92.84% | -24.75% | -68.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.55% | -37.01% | -62.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.83% | -42.84% | -56.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.42% | 0.00% | -98.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.65% | -31.75% | -33.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 71.77% | 9.57% | +62.20% |
Volatility
LESL vs. ENVA - Volatility Comparison
Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) has a higher volatility of 61.49% compared to Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) at 10.02%. This indicates that LESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LESL | ENVA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 61.49% | 10.02% | +51.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 135.29% | 26.62% | +108.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 201.28% | 38.58% | +162.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.90% | 40.27% | +70.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 105.96% | 49.23% | +56.73% |
Dividends
LESL vs. ENVA - Dividend Comparison
Neither LESL nor ENVA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LESL vs. ENVA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leslie's, Inc. and Enova International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LESL vs. ENVA - Profitability Comparison
LESL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.35M and revenue of 184.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.
ENVA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 875.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LESL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.86M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
ENVA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 207.11M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.7%.
LESL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a net income of -52.50M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in a net margin of -28.4%.
ENVA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 91.10M and revenue of 875.14M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LESL and ENVA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LESL has higher volatility (61.49%) compared to ENVA (10.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LESL dropped -99.85% vs ENVA's -84.26%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LESL and ENVA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer