PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LESL vs. WMT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LESL vs. WMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LESL achieves a 183.03% return, which is significantly higher than WMT's 5.33% return.


LESL

1D
18.23%
1M
199.36%
YTD
183.03%
6M
65.02%
1Y
-70.64%
3Y*
-71.66%
5Y*
-62.07%
10Y*

WMT

1D
3.39%
1M
-10.14%
YTD
5.33%
6M
2.78%
1Y
17.89%
3Y*
34.52%
5Y*
21.38%
10Y*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LESL vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
183.03%-96.30%-67.73%-43.41%-48.39%-14.74%27.88%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
5.33%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%3.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LESL and WMT is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2020

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LESL:

$43.56M

WMT:

$935.00B

EPS

LESL:

-$29.76

WMT:

$2.88

PS Ratio

LESL:

0.04

WMT:

1.29

Total Revenue (TTM)

LESL:

$1.22B

WMT:

$725.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LESL:

$428.40M

WMT:

$181.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

LESL:

-$176.53M

WMT:

$44.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LESL vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LESL
LESL Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
LESL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LESL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
LESL Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
LESL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
LESL Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LESL vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LESLWMTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.16

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.75

1.14

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.93

3.84

-4.76

LESL vs. WMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LESL Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the WMT Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LESL and WMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LESLWMTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.37

0.76

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.58

0.99

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

0.64

-1.18

Drawdowns

LESL vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LESL drawdown since its inception was -99.85%, which is greater than WMT's maximum drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LESL and WMT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LESLWMTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.85%

-77.14%

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.21%

-15.75%

-78.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.58%

-21.93%

-77.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.85%

-25.74%

-74.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.25%

-12.90%

-86.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.39%

-14.63%

-50.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

76.14%

4.74%

+71.40%

Volatility

LESL vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison

Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) has a higher volatility of 98.93% compared to Walmart Inc. (WMT) at 10.05%. This indicates that LESL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LESLWMTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

98.93%

10.05%

+88.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

129.18%

18.63%

+110.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

190.67%

23.70%

+166.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

106.69%

21.68%

+85.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

102.46%

21.72%

+80.74%

Dividends

LESL vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison

LESL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LESL
Leslie's, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.83%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

LESL vs. WMT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leslie's, Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
184.74M
177.75B
(LESL) Total Revenue
(WMT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LESL vs. WMT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Leslie's, Inc. and Walmart Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%20222023202420252026
28.9%
25.1%
Portfolio components
LESL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a gross profit of 53.35M and revenue of 184.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

LESL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported an operating income of -38.86M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

LESL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leslie's, Inc. reported a net income of -52.50M and revenue of 184.74M, resulting in a net margin of -28.4%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LESL and WMT have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LESL has higher volatility (98.93%) compared to WMT (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LESL dropped -99.85% vs WMT's -77.14%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LESL and WMT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer