SLM vs. BRKR
SLM (SLM Corporation) and BRKR (Bruker Corporation) are both stocks. SLM operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while BRKR operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, SLM returned 15.49%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for BRKR. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SLM vs. BRKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLM achieves a -2.71% return, which is significantly lower than BRKR's 33.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SLM has outperformed BRKR with an annualized return of 15.49%, while BRKR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.22% annualized return.
SLM
- 1D
- 0.60%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- -2.71%
- 1Y
- -14.98%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.31%
BRKR
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 42.22%
- YTD
- 33.71%
- 1Y
- 66.23%
- 3Y*
- -3.23%
- 5Y*
- -4.91%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.58%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $120.41M | $119.38M | $134.96M | |
| $82.75M | $78.72M | $65.04M |
SLM vs. BRKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLM SLM Corporation | -2.71% | -0.20% | 47.25% | 18.70% | -13.47% | 60.54% | 40.89% | 8.60% | -26.46% | 2.54% |
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 33.71% | -19.24% | -19.99% | 7.82% | -18.29% | 55.35% | 6.58% | 71.85% | -12.82% | 62.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLM and BRKR is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2000 | 0.26 |
The correlation between SLM and BRKR shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SLM:
$4.89B
BRKR:
$9.57B
SLM:
$3.66
BRKR:
-$0.17
SLM:
1.73
BRKR:
2.77
SLM:
1.98
BRKR:
3.89
SLM:
$3.00B
BRKR:
$3.46B
SLM:
$1.91B
BRKR:
$1.57B
SLM:
$1.22B
BRKR:
$224.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLM vs. BRKR — Risk / Return Rank
SLM
BRKR
SLM vs. BRKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SLM Corporation (SLM) and Bruker Corporation (BRKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLM | BRKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.22 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.39 | 1.62 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 3.59 | -4.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLM vs. BRKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLM drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, roughly equal to the maximum BRKR drawdown of -94.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLM and BRKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLM | BRKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -94.83% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.88% | -39.85% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -45.06% | -68.72% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.06% | -68.72% | +23.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.79% | -68.72% | +16.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.81% | -32.69% | +9.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.88% | -57.58% | +27.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.10% | 18.13% | +5.97% |
Volatility
SLM vs. BRKR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SLM Corporation (SLM) is 9.85%, while Bruker Corporation (BRKR) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that SLM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLM | BRKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 15.14% | -5.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.48% | 39.61% | -9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.30% | 54.27% | -14.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.88% | 42.20% | -6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.78% | 38.03% | -1.25% |
Dividends
SLM vs. BRKR - Dividend Comparison
SLM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than BRKR's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKR Bruker Corporation | 0.32% | 0.42% | 0.34% | 0.27% | 0.29% | 0.19% | 0.30% | 0.31% | 0.54% | 0.47% | 0.76% |
SLM SLM Corporation | 2.00% | 1.92% | 1.67% | 2.30% | 2.65% | 1.02% | 0.97% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SLM vs. BRKR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SLM Corporation and Bruker Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SLM vs. BRKR - Profitability Comparison
SLM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported a gross profit of 501.80M and revenue of 602.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.4%.
BRKR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bruker Corporation reported a gross profit of 379.80M and revenue of 823.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.
SLM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported an operating income of 307.51M and revenue of 602.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.1%.
BRKR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bruker Corporation reported an operating income of 10.20M and revenue of 823.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.2%.
SLM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, SLM Corporation reported a net income of 54.94M and revenue of 602.06M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.
BRKR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bruker Corporation reported a net income of 0.00 and revenue of 823.40M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLM and BRKR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BRKR has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to SLM (9.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLM dropped -94.50% vs BRKR's -94.83%.
BRKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLM and BRKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer